Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Senate Passes Eminent Domain Bill
Ohio e-CPA Weekly | (Oct. 10 - 14, 2005)

Posted on 10/14/2005 6:51:50 AM PDT by mr_hammer

Ohio e-CPA Weekly, Issue 41 (Oct. 10 - 14, 2005)

Ohio Senate Passes Eminent Domain Bill

The Ohio Senate passed legislation that would ban local governments from seizing land through eminent domain for the purposes of private development.

The Senate voted unanimously to pass SB 167. The measure was introduced in response to a U.S. Supreme Court decision, which upheld the government's use of eminent domain to acquire private property for private development projects and to generate more tax revenue.

The Ohio House is expected to consider the legislation promptly. If passed by the House and enacted, the bill would impose a moratorium on the use of eminent domain for the purposes of private development until the legislature can study the issue more thoroughly.

Date Last Modified: 10/13/2005


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; ohiosenate; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2005 6:51:55 AM PDT by mr_hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Are you listening Charlie Crist?


2 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:39 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Good. I live in a lackluster, but well maintained, 45 year old colonial, surrounded by a "track mansion" development.
3 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:43 AM PDT by keats5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

yeah but that bill won't stop the local governments from stopping farmers and private landowners from selling their land either.

Seriously, out on the eastside of Columbus, a couple farmers wanted to sell their land so that a bunch of houses and a strip mall and a Wal Mart could be built. Literally the local governments told them they COULDN'T sell their land.


4 posted on 10/14/2005 6:54:45 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Finally Ohio Republicans do something right.


5 posted on 10/14/2005 6:56:01 AM PDT by RockinRight (I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Glad to see you and your tagline are back:)


6 posted on 10/14/2005 6:56:14 AM PDT by SE Mom (Keep an open mind; nothing will fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

And now if Ohio can get Ken Blackwell elected, things may very well be looking up for Ohio.


7 posted on 10/14/2005 6:56:17 AM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
Literally the local governments told them they COULDN'T sell their land.

Enviroweenie regulations?

8 posted on 10/14/2005 6:56:57 AM PDT by RockinRight (I am beginning to think conservatism is buried somewhere under New Orleans' mud...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

nope.

The excuse was TRAFFIC.

literally.


9 posted on 10/14/2005 6:58:59 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

LOL

me too :)


10 posted on 10/14/2005 6:59:21 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Finally Ohio Republicans do something right.

until the legislature can study the issue more thoroughly.

Looks like we're not entirely out of the woods yet.

11 posted on 10/14/2005 6:59:27 AM PDT by krshnbrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: krshnbrn

yeah but it was a unamimous vote in the OHio Senate and my bet is the House will be the same.

They won't be in session until after the elections I don't believe so that isn't necessarily a bad thing.


12 posted on 10/14/2005 7:00:45 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
the bill would impose a moratorium on the use of eminent domain for the purposes of private development until the legislature can study the issue more thoroughly.

"until the legislature can study the issue more thoroughly"

This actually means until after the next election cycle when the moratorium will be abandoned.

It's a band aid

13 posted on 10/14/2005 7:03:44 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

I'm sure it will pass but what worries me is this is just a temporary ban while they "study" the issue. If they have to "study" a no brainer like this we need to make sure they've completed the study and enacted a final decision before we hit the polls next fall. Any legislator who perverts imminent domain to allow this type private property confiscation deserves no conservatives vote.


14 posted on 10/14/2005 7:08:08 AM PDT by krshnbrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: krshnbrn

then the point is to get conservatives elected to the Ohio House and Senate then.

it is a band aid, but it is a band aid in the right direction.

Ohio is full of RINOs, but sometimes it will screw up in the right direction :-)


15 posted on 10/14/2005 7:16:58 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (yes I am back. Don't ask.... :-) ok ask if you want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
What is there to study? It's just plain wrong to steel someones property. C'mon Ohio (The State Legislature) pass a law to stop the theft of property. It is the moral thing to do. Do not count on this issue fading away, we are watching you!
16 posted on 10/14/2005 7:20:53 AM PDT by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Could be that they're being considered critical to Ohio being able to sustain it's own source of food production.

I remember reading about legislation that would allow certain farms to be sold only to someone else who wanted to farm the land and not to developers.


17 posted on 10/14/2005 7:22:36 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
"until the legislature can study the issue more thoroughly."
BR>

Study it? I don't want to see them study it! I want them to fix it! This doesn't stop me from having to worry about the future. Grrrr

And why waste our tax dollars on a study? We don't need a study, we know it's wrong! wrong! wrong! The only thing a study will get you is some big dollars into "some" peoples hands who are willing to "bleep" the rest of us little guys over! Grrr

18 posted on 10/14/2005 8:09:57 AM PDT by GloriaJane (http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
then the point is to get conservatives elected to the Ohio House and Senate then.

Many so called conservatives seem to support the premise of shifting property ownership to increse tax revenue(or perhaps campaign donations). If a liberal opposes it and the conservative supports it I'll hold my nose and vote liberal.

19 posted on 10/14/2005 9:00:29 AM PDT by krshnbrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: krshnbrn

"Study" means "delay, hoping that the public will cool down and forget about the issue."


20 posted on 10/14/2005 10:55:59 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (what have you done today to fight terrorism/leftism (same thing!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson