Skip to comments.
Four reason adding sexual orientation to hate crimes will destroy America
Exton
Posted on 10/14/2005 1:52:02 AM PDT by Exton1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
10/14/2005 1:52:04 AM PDT
by
Exton1
To: Exton1
Do you have an article or news item to justify posting this rant?
To: Exton1; EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; ...
3
posted on
10/14/2005 2:09:47 AM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: Exton1
The phrase "sexual orientation" is made up by homosexuals to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex . . . The last thing the sodomites want people to know is what they really do behind closed doors. Years ago I read an article about this. It disgusted me thoroughly. Sodomites do not want to associate their nasty practices with the fact that the average age of death for male sodomites is 41, female sodomites, 45.
To: Misterioso
5
posted on
10/14/2005 2:11:28 AM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: Exton1
Your title is Four reason adding sexual orientation to hate crimes will destroy America, but you just list 4 reasons to hate homosexuals. While I am disgusted as the next guy at the behavior of sodomites I am far more fearful of the very idea of "hate crimes". Beating someone up is wrong. It doesn't make it more or less wrong if you beat them up because they are gay, Jewish, black, or Hispanic.
6
posted on
10/14/2005 2:22:04 AM PDT
by
Gator61
To: Gator61
You're absolutely right. We don't need hate crimes laws of any sort.
7
posted on
10/14/2005 2:28:56 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Fresh Wind
You're absolutely right. We don't need hate crimes laws of any sort. I agree. Burning down a church, synagogue, mosque, gay bar or abortion clinic should each have the same stiff penalty of a long term in prison.
9
posted on
10/14/2005 2:51:54 AM PDT
by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: Exton1
There is a good chance that such legislation would also negate laws against the various forms of incest...
To: Exton1
If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure. Is it ok with you if the woman is on top, or are you in the camp that claims the missionary position is the only one that should be legal ?
11
posted on
10/14/2005 3:17:07 AM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Exton1

"PL-L-LEEE-EEE-EEASE DON'T DO IT!"
12
posted on
10/14/2005 3:47:55 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: Exton1
What the heck is frotteurism?
13
posted on
10/14/2005 3:50:51 AM PDT
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: H. Paul Pressler IV
Burning down a ... mosque Mosques are military installations. They do not belong with the other examples you listed.
ML/NJ
14
posted on
10/14/2005 4:16:24 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: Misterioso
To: Fresh Wind
Do agree-- when I was subject to the informal rules of the
old schoolyard .I had a reputation as the person anyone wanting a reputation as a fighter had to start with.
In my recollection of those days when such activity was
not genrally a police matter-- We often justified our
tests of steregnth and skill by the verbal taunt -name calling. And these jibes continued throughout the contest.
But then once a thing was decided ( and most often they stopped at or before first blood was drawn) the comatants
ended up better friends than they would have been otherwise. Hate Crimes laws will destroy what is left of
America-but the house has been divided longer than I have been alive. I disagree only in th epost that suggests the
four reasons given do not suggest destruction of America.
For when the First Amendment is subverted or rejected
then that fundamental law does suggest in it's demise a
destruction of America.
To: humblegunner
frotteurism is when someone rubs up against another to gain sexual gratification (cop a feel). They make it seem as if it is unintentional when in fact it was on purpose.
17
posted on
10/14/2005 5:37:00 AM PDT
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: Khepera
"frotteurism is when someone rubs up against another to gain sexual gratification (cop a feel). They make it seem as if it is unintentional when in fact it was on purpose."
See also: New York City Subway System.
:(
18
posted on
10/14/2005 5:40:25 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: LIConFem
Exactly but I didn't want to mention it.
19
posted on
10/14/2005 6:03:10 AM PDT
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: RedEyeJack
Not to mention pedophilia.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson