Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious 'half-animal, half-plant' marine microbe discovered by Japanese researchers
Mainichi Daily News (Japan - Excerpt) ^ | October 14, 2005

Posted on 10/13/2005 8:46:39 PM PDT by HAL9000

Excerpt -

TSUKUBA, Ibaraki -- A mysterious marine microbe, half of whose individual cells eat algae like animals while the rest perform photosynthesis like plants, has been discovered, a University of Tsukuba research team said.

The discovery, the first of its kind, will be carried in the U.S. magazine Science that will be published on Friday.

"I think the discovery of the 'half-animal, half-plant' microbe shows part of the process of single-cell marine microbes evolving into plants," Prof. Isao Inoue, a member of the research team, said.


(Excerpt) Read more at mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: crevolist; halfplanthalfanimal; hatena; microbe; wakayama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: AdmSmith

Thanks for the excerpt, but I got lost after the third word.


21 posted on 10/14/2005 1:02:36 AM PDT by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

22 posted on 10/14/2005 1:11:31 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Sorry for the technical lingo. You may read more here

Algea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algea

Mitochondrion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrion


23 posted on 10/14/2005 1:17:11 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
But I can not spell Algea =>Algae
24 posted on 10/14/2005 1:20:07 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blam
"I think the discovery of the 'half-animal, half-plant' microbe shows part of the process of single-cell marine microbes evolving into plants."

I would have guessed the other way round.

Evolution is a religion.
A whale farts, and it becomes evidence for the missing link.

25 posted on 10/14/2005 1:23:15 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

Evolution is no more a religion than gravity, i.e. none at all.

An understanding of evolution is the basis of understanding biology, ecology and medicine. No antibiotics or flu vaccine for you, I guess! Next!


26 posted on 10/14/2005 2:28:03 AM PDT by Free as the breeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Free as the breeze
An understanding of evolution is the basis of understanding biology, ecology and medicine. No antibiotics or flu vaccine for you, I guess! Next!

No it's not. Furthermore antibiotics and vaccines existed before evolution theology. The germ theory of disease was developed quite independently of ET. The first vaccine created in 1796.

27 posted on 10/14/2005 2:37:09 AM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; js1138; Ichneumon; furball4paws; Coyoteman; b_sharp

Is this real? I don't want to ping the evolution list for some kind of UFO story.


28 posted on 10/14/2005 2:39:10 AM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1; Free as the breeze
Evolution is a religion.

I suppose it may look that way to someone grossly ignorant of science, and/or to those who themselves see everything through the filter of religion, and thus presume that everyone else must also.

Also, how does your bizarre belief deal with the fact that the majority of American "evolutionists" are Christians? Sorry if that makes your head explode.

A whale farts, and it becomes evidence for the missing link.

As I was saying about grossly ignorant...

29 posted on 10/14/2005 2:51:14 AM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1; Free as the breeze
Furthermore antibiotics and vaccines existed before evolution theology. The germ theory of disease was developed quite independently of ET. The first vaccine created in 1796.

Yes, but understanding *why* vaccines work, *how* they work, and more importantly, how pathogens eventually bypass the vaccinations and new preventative measures are required (and how to slow down the process so that we can keep one step ahead of the pathogens) are all subjects that rely heavily upon an intimate understanding of evolution and how it operates in the real world, because both the body's immune system reponse, and the response of pathogens to antibiotics and vaccines, both operate via evolution.

So we'll make you a deal -- if you insist on living in the Dark Ages and rejecting well-established science, then you'll only be allowed to receive vaccinations (and other medical treatments) which existed before 1859, and/or were developed with absolutely no reference to or research from evolutionary biology. And that will leave you with precious little. Deal?

Or maybe you could just stop spewing ignorant nonsense.

30 posted on 10/14/2005 2:57:11 AM PDT by Ichneumon (Certified pedantic coxcomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Yes, the research is OK, but the description in the article is not especially good.


31 posted on 10/14/2005 3:05:49 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

The Thing From Another World! That was a great film! Amazing how influential it was - those motion-tracker scenes from Aliens were nicked from this 50s beauty. And didn't it end with "Keep watching the skies!"?

Sorry. Movie geek rant.


32 posted on 10/14/2005 3:07:33 AM PDT by Bombay Bloke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Oh good grief. [moronicism alert]


33 posted on 10/14/2005 3:20:06 AM PDT by Havoc (King George and President George. Coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

Understanding what evolution is and how is works is the underpinning of modern biology.

Doesn't matter if you "believe" it or not.

What are your qualifications for coming to an educated conclusion regarding the data involved?


34 posted on 10/14/2005 6:45:01 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bombay Bloke

Great memories, though.


35 posted on 10/14/2005 6:46:33 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
"No it's not. Furthermore antibiotics and vaccines existed before evolution theology. The germ theory of disease was developed quite independently of ET. The first vaccine created in 1796.

Well I guess we'll have to make sure you get the 1796 vaccine while the rest of us get vaccines developed through the understanding of evolution.

36 posted on 10/14/2005 9:06:39 AM PDT by b_sharp (Making a monkey of a creationist should be a natural goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"Is this real? I don't want to ping the evolution list for some kind of UFO story.

The English portion of the MSN news release looks legit, but my Japanese isn't up to the task of verifying the original. Would you like me to forward the Japanese text to my daughter-in-law?

I could get her to send you some sushi if you want.

37 posted on 10/14/2005 9:16:08 AM PDT by b_sharp (Making a monkey of a creationist should be a natural goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
Nice, maybe it was a similar transition period when the mitochondrion was incorporated into the eukaryotic cell.

Excellent correlation.

38 posted on 10/14/2005 9:22:15 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I jez calls it az I see it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
I could get her to send you some sushi if you want.

I don't do sushi. We'll have to pass on the thread.

39 posted on 10/14/2005 9:32:54 AM PDT by PatrickHenry ( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

You can always wait until it comes out in Science. But I think it makes sense (been wrong before, though).


40 posted on 10/14/2005 10:25:39 AM PDT by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson