Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/13/2005 1:39:24 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ARealMothersSonForever; NixonsAngryGhost; indcons; 2ndreconmarine; Stellar Dendrite; nerdgirl; ...

ping


2 posted on 10/13/2005 1:40:14 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

More hatred from another stealth leftist. </s>


3 posted on 10/13/2005 1:49:01 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Why were we supposed to believe she is conservative, again?


4 posted on 10/13/2005 1:50:15 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite
The wingniuts going nutzo, and before you scream and call for my banning, it was Drudge who called Free Republic the home of the wingnuts in a Howard Kurtz/Wash Post column.

The circle has come full circle.

5 posted on 10/13/2005 1:50:59 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

This is BS, Miers will never change. Never mind that she went from being a Gore-supporting Catholic Democrat to a Bush-adoring evangelical Republican in the past 20 years ... she'll never change again!


6 posted on 10/13/2005 1:51:09 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country" -- Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"...her declaration that she had refrained from joining "politically charged" organizations like the Federalist Society, even though she had been a member of the liberal Progressive Voters League. When the lawyer questioning her asked if the NAACP (of which she was not a member) was "in the category of organizations you were talking about"--i.e., "politically charged"--she answered "no."

This was in 1989 - just 16 years ago. Now her supporters claim that she's a conservative. If she can change that much in 16 years, what's to stop her from changing back over the course of the next 16 years?

Answer: Nothing.


11 posted on 10/13/2005 1:55:44 PM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite
She's going "to grow" on the bench.

She's going to become a lefty FOR SURE.

13 posted on 10/13/2005 1:58:17 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

I guess this answers the question, "What kind of person would John Kerry appoint to the Supreme Court?"


16 posted on 10/13/2005 2:03:42 PM PDT by msnimje (14-Day Free Trial into Monthly Subscription to Times Select, $7.95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Here's the message I sent Taranto in response to this column:




Dear BOTW:

Even more damning than the substance of the wobbly opinions expressed by Miers as documented in today's BOTW is their form. So poor is her written and oral expression that they would have to improve significantly to be considered mediocre, to wit:

"the lack of pay was a disadvantage to the ability of people to serve." - She presumably meant "disincentive."

"I have supported the maternal nurse care that was eliminated, be restored." Awkward and poorly constructed.

"The day-care money that was deleted I have asked be restored because they principally benefit women and minorities in my view." Singular "money," plural "they."

"The construction of housing that was large in number, close together, close to the street where there wasn't a place for children to play or really just seemed so compact that it didn't seem like it was planned properly to provide the kind of environment where people could really exist and have much of an existence." - Housing that was "large in number"? Also: error in parallel construction, redundant, etc.

As I'm sure you know, in his NY Times column today David Brooks exposed other examples of Miers' painfully incompetent writing.

Elitism charges be damned, I'll say it: Harriet Miers manifestly lacks the intellectual ability necessary to be a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Sincerely,


27 posted on 10/13/2005 2:36:31 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (check out my posts on Today show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite
There was once Harriet lawyerette,
Who by sixty would not marry yet,
She sucked up to royalty,
Who did reward her loyalty,
Appointing suffragette to join the SC octet!

33 posted on 10/13/2005 2:48:58 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Miers Ping #2.


44 posted on 10/13/2005 3:33:48 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

bttt


46 posted on 10/13/2005 3:34:42 PM PDT by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite
all I ever said was that she was scary looking. And I caught flack for that!
55 posted on 10/13/2005 4:36:48 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (denial is the opiate of the masses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Conservative base is putting the pressure on Bush

The thing to watch is the democrat base ( abortionists-- gays --anti wars--environmental wackos--anti religionists etc )reaction

They CAN NOT be happy with a devout BORN AGAIN nominee BUT since they conservatives are against her they must be in a quandry as to what position to take


56 posted on 10/13/2005 4:47:22 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite
Senate Judiciary Republicans release statements regarding the hearings..

Mr. Sessions (R)Mr. Sessions affirmative…. “My conversations with Harriet Miers indicate that she is a first-rate lawyer and a fine person. Her legal skills are proven and her reputation throughout the legal community is excellent. It is not necessary that she have previous experience as a judge in order to serve on the Supreme Court. It’s perfectly acceptable to nominate outstanding lawyers to that position. I look forward to the confirmation process and to learning more about her judicial philosophy.”

Mr. Cornyn (R) Mr Cornyn…affirmative "The President has announced his nominee to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court of the United States: Harriet Miers, currently serving as White House Counsel. As he did with Judge John G. Roberts, Jr., the President has chosen an outstanding nominee for our nation's highest court. The Senate should consider this nomination in both a thorough and expedient manner.

"Harriet Miers is a brilliant legal mind. She is a woman of outstanding character who clearly understands what it means to follow the law. She is deeply committed to public service, and has a distinguished history of professional achievement. It is clear that her past experiences have well prepared her for the honor of serving our country as a Supreme Court Justice. I strongly support her nomination.

"It is important that we put aside partisanship, and that the Senate fulfill its constitutional responsibility of advice and consent. This fine nominee must be treated with civility and respect, not as a political pawn. I hope that we in the Senate can move forward in a manner worthy of the American people."

Mr. Coburn (R) Mr.Coburn..affirmative. “Harriet Miers deserves a fair and thorough hearing and confirmation process. I look forward to learning more about her qualifications and judicial philosophy in the coming days,” Dr. Coburn said, adding that he plans to meet with Miers this week.”

.

57 posted on 10/13/2005 5:17:56 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Republicans should give Miers a fair vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stellar Dendrite

We know almost nothing about Miers and what little we do looks pathetically poor. The bottom line is that Bush blew an opportunity to decisively change the balance of the court in an originalist direction -- an opportunity that may not occur for another generation. It's tragic that he overlooked a score of prospects with judicial temperaments, constitutional expertise, and proven originalist judicial track records in favor of a third-rate political crony who - if confirmed - will have to have on-the-job training in constitutional law. Miers isn't just unqualified compared to the many prospects who have stellar qualifications -- she's almost embarrassing as a nominee. Bush has insulted his conservative base and ignored the best thought among conservatism -- John Fund, George Will, Rush Limbaugh, David Frum, Ann Coulter,Pat Buchanan, to cite just a few. But then again many conservatives have long known that Bush is no true conservative. Bush's sole defense of his crony: trust me. Doesn't that give us conservatives an unpleasant reminder of someone else who once said, "read my lips"? Sadly for his legacy and the nation, Bush has proved himself unequal to the task.


60 posted on 10/13/2005 5:57:31 PM PDT by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson