Why is it that the more reprehensible and disgusting behavior is, the more it is revered and cherished by the left?
The NEA supports the gay agenda in spite of the effects on children.
I wish insurance companies could act on these statistics,
WARNING: Explicit content.
It is my humble opinion that homosexuals are created by other homosexuals. So many tell the same story: "I was molested as a boy (some as young as four years old) by a man/priest/uncle…" etc. So these otherwise normally functioning hetero boys believe that when (if) they became sexually aroused through stimulation, they must have enjoyed it. Which means they must be homosexual.
The fact is that their equipment worked. Period. They became aroused because their equipment worked. That does not mean they enjoyed it. That does not mean they are homosexual. It means they were savagely violated by a pervert.
I'm sure this thread will be pulled soon. It offers way too much of an opportunity for rational discussion of a sensitive subject.
I wonder if DIVERSITY TRAINING crappolla includes the 'downside' of homosexual behavior.
Here is the thread title, it was posted yesterday.
The Unholy Sacrament of Diversity Training The Remnant
^ | 10/05 | William Price
BUMP to be read by EVERYONE!
This is why GLSEN wants to be with your children.
The law does not consider 18 year olds "boys" and for 18, 19 and 20 year olds, younger ages may be an "acceptable" consent age. I haven't looked at the source of the footnote, but I suspect they included 18 year olds since it added weight to the statistic they were trying to portray. We could also look at the age of the questioned when the activity tookplace. It may be possible that this response included acts committed before the men questioned were 18 as there is no time frame established for the act.
I only highlight this, since purposely skewed statistics, will be sighted by others to debunk the entire content.
bump.
The homosexual lifestyle is much more dangerous than smoking. I wonder when state AG's are going to sue "big gay" to fund anti-homosexual programs...
not that there's anything wrong with that...
?????. Just ewwww.
The "statistics" totally botch the APA's stand for continued criminalization of pedophilia.
Going back to the suspect Kinsey work from the late 40's in ridiculous. But let's look at recent data:
over their lifetimes, 6 percent of men and 11 percent of women reported having such experiences. About 1 percent of men and 3 percent of women said they had had both male and female sexual partners within 12 months...
The data come from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, a survey of 12,571 men and women aged 15 to 44...
NY Times Article, SEPT 17, 2005
I could continue "correcting" the "statistics" but I think it should be clear some are out of date if not suspect. It's one thing to have an opinion which opposes homosexuality but it's another to draw upon false, misleading or very old data. Heck, one of their sources is Playboy!
Isn't a Bishop or Cardinal of Chicago Arch Diocese going to march in an upcomming Gay parade? (In the name of outreach)
Question #2:
Any on know if NAMBLA be present in this same particular parade??
Seems pretty ball-zy after the pedophile priest scandal!...I'll should fly out to protest that one!
I think we need a Catholic Faithful Tour, much like the Support our Troops Tour (aka U dont speak for me Cindy Tour). It would involve alot of praying, and protest, and solidarity with our brothers trapped in certain Liberal Heterodox Dioceses. What do ya say? We would get EWTN coverage for sure. Movement! Plan Now
Mark for later read.
"Homosexuals are ....19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident."
I don't understand how that can be. I would think that gay guys would be proficient at handling a stickshift.
73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age (9).
These statistics seem to contradict each other...I don't believe that the gap can be explained by the 18-year-olds.
bumping...
