Matthews said, from the beginning, Rove and Livvy were suspected of being involved with the leak about Wilson's wife being CIA, "so really, nothing's changed", he said, "except what we've learned from these leaks we get, from lawyers involved in the case".
Matthews also said, What we know now that we didn't know back then, is Karl Rove's email to Steven Hadley, and Judith Miller's notes.
"leaks from lawyers involved in the case", said Matthews.
I just have to wonder why Murray Waas, writing for National Journal, is the only "journalist" receiving these leaks. Everything important that's been leaked recently, are first reported by Wass, and only after he writes about the leaks, do the MSM use the information as if it's valid, as if it's their own revelations.
What did that e-mail say? Didn't Rove say that he didn't take the bait? (What does he mean by that?) I take it to mean he didn't get into who Plame was. Is that it?
On O'Reilly last night, the blowhard actually made a good observation. He says that, once someone goes to the grand jury more than two times, generally possible perjury is being investigated.
Now, who has lied about this matter?
Why, the two reporters in question, in claiming they did not have a release from their sources.
And this week, Rove testified before Miller did. If you are springing a perjury trap, who testifies second? IMO the person you are trying to trap.
So methinks any indictments will have nothing to do with the original allegation (because no crime was committed) and everything to do with perjury to cover up a conspiracy.
This email concerning Rove's conversation to Cooper in which he said Cooper asked him about Wilson and in which Rove claimed Cooper and he first discussed welfare reform is NOT new. I am sure I heard of it months and months ago.