[YaYa123]

"leaks from lawyers involved in the case", said Matthews.

I just have to wonder why Murray Waas, writing for National Journal, is the only "journalist" receiving these leaks. Everything important that's been leaked recently, are first reported by Wass, and only after he writes about the leaks, do the MSM use the information as if it's valid, as if it's their own revelations.

[Verginius Rufus]

The Waas piece was posted on FR on Tuesday evening...it seemed to be a hit piece against the administration. What is his background? I vaguely recall the name.

I watched a couple of minutes of Chris Matthews last night...they were spinning the line that Libby was in trouble for not telling Fitzgerald about the earlier conversation with Miller. It may be that the earlier conversation was so inconsequential that Libby forgot about it, but they were putting a sinister spin on it. I guess the other possibility is that Miller's newly-discovered notes were written recently.

[Carolinamom]

I thought the media was sore about this WH not being communicative. Now, they're saying there are leakers in the WH? Which is it?

[Mo1]

I just have to wonder why Murray Waas, writing for National Journal, is the only "journalist" receiving these leaks.

My mind is going blank, but his name is ringing a bell

But I can't remember why

Gosh I hate getting old

[an amused spectator]

I just have to wonder why Murray Waas, writing for National Journal, is the only "journalist" receiving these leaks.

Murray Waas was Joe "Dead Eyes" Conason's partner during the impeachment wars:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22conason%22+and+%22waas%22&btnG=Google+Search

I imagine that ol' Murray is just an "impartial jernalist". Not.