On O'Reilly last night, the blowhard actually made a good observation. He says that, once someone goes to the grand jury more than two times, generally possible perjury is being investigated.
Now, who has lied about this matter?
Why, the two reporters in question, in claiming they did not have a release from their sources.
And this week, Rove testified before Miller did. If you are springing a perjury trap, who testifies second? IMO the person you are trying to trap.
So methinks any indictments will have nothing to do with the original allegation (because no crime was committed) and everything to do with perjury to cover up a conspiracy.