Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CWA: What We Need to Know About Harriet Miers
Concerned Women for America ^ | 10/10/05 | Stacy Holliday

Posted on 10/10/2005 11:30:08 AM PDT by jdhljc169

Washington, D.C. – Concerned Women for America (CWA) has released a memorandum explaining its evaluation of information about Harriet Miers, President Bush’s nominee to succeed Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. The memo explains why CWA is unable to endorse the nomination at this time based on current information about Miss Miers. It is available on CWA’s Web site, www.cwfa.org.

“CWA staff have been heavily involved in evaluating Miss Miers’ background and qualifications,” said Jan LaRue, CWA’s chief counsel. “We have learned nothing new that allows us to endorse her at this time. Whether we can eventually support her will depend on answers to questions raised in our memorandum and what is learned during the hearing process. We believe the American people deserve convincing evidence that Miss Miers can be trusted with a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court,” LaRue added.

“Nothing we have seen or heard establishes Miss Miers' knowledge of and experience in constitutional law. Much is made of her leadership within the American Bar Association, an organization that is hardly known for opposing the ‘living theory’ of constitutional interpretation and judicial activism,” LaRue concluded.

“While we share Miss Miers’ evangelical faith, we find the continual emphasis on it by her supporters to be inappropriate and patronizing,” LaRue said. “It offends the Constitution.”

Every judicial nominee deserves a dignified hearing and nothing less than a swift, up or down vote at the conclusion of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The American people are entitled to fairness from judges and from senators who sit in judgment of them.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cwa; harrietmiers; miers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: flashbunny; jdhljc169; stylin19a; fifthvirginia; AntiGuv; Betaille; dangus; Stellar Dendrite
It's amazing how savvy these people were about lies in politics back when Clinton was in office. Then 2000 comes, and whoosh, it's like The National Endowment for Lobotomies.

Posted by: BarrettBrown on October 7, 2005 at 1:47 PM

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_10/007284.php

Words of wisdom.

Please Mr. President, for the sake of your presidency, if not your party or the country, please withdraw this nominee...before it's too late.

21 posted on 10/10/2005 2:42:31 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169
I stopped paying attention to what the CWA had to say when they wrote an article a while back accusing Bush of having the most pro-homosexual administration ever. What lying garbage!
22 posted on 10/10/2005 2:52:43 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

LOL! Great movie!


23 posted on 10/10/2005 5:30:45 PM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson