Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Black box' information driving convictions (Automobile black boxes)
Automotive Body Repair News ^ | Oct 3, 2005 | Tim Sramcik

Posted on 10/09/2005 5:04:56 PM PDT by Ben Mugged

In what is becoming a familiar scene in courtrooms nationwide, information collected from a car’s “black box” was used to convict a motorist of criminal charges.

On June 30, a Peabody, Mass., District Court jury found Michelle Zimmerman guilty of misdemeanor motor vehicle homicide in the death of her front seat passenger, Kenneth Carlson. The jury concluded Zimmerman was driving negligently when she skidded out of control and struck a tree on Jan. 4, 2003. Information collected from the event data recorder (EDR), or black box, in her GMC Yukon reported that Zimmerman was driving 58 mph in a 40 mph zone—on an icy road, according to Essex Assistant District Attorney William J. Melkonian. EDR data also showed that Zimmerman never applied the brakes.

Judge Santo Ruma sentenced Zimmerman to two years in prison, one year to be served with the balance suspended for three years of probation. The conviction carries a statutory 10-year loss of license.

Defense lawyer Robert Weiner has vowed to appeal based on his claims that the EDR data was misinterpreted and that police illegally obtained the data. The case could set a legal precedent in Massachusetts and nationwide where EDR information already has been introduced in more than two-dozen cases.

(Excerpt) Read more at abrn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: automobile; bigbrotheronwheels; blackbox; copinyourpocket; edr; eventdatarecorder; generalmotors; gm; nannystate; orwellalert; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last
Good thing or bad thing? I know this article is dated 3 Oct but it doesn't appear to have been discussed.
1 posted on 10/09/2005 5:05:04 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Right to privacy dictate the removal of these devices from cars.

These devices are designed to prosecute the owner, not to defend. They don't tell you what was going on around the vehicle, only the reactions by the driver.
2 posted on 10/09/2005 5:08:13 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

At common law, a man's servant could not testify against him since the servant was considered to be an "extension" of the man. (Part of this survives in the prohibition against spouses testifying against each other.) An argument against this will begin from Fifth Amendment grounds. Who knows where it will end....


3 posted on 10/09/2005 5:11:39 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

What? Are you asking if material evidence is good or bad?
Maybe it depends on whether you have something to hide or not.
Your'e not one of those creepy suspicious types who think Big Brother is nosing around in your garbage so as to imprison you for life? Are you?
Or perhaps you think "freedom" is a license to steal and kill?
What do you think? Since you asked.


4 posted on 10/09/2005 5:12:30 PM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

What?

Say in English...


5 posted on 10/09/2005 5:17:56 PM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Snickersnee

Machinery (and drug-sniffing dogs) do not "testify," they merely provide data to be interpreted.


6 posted on 10/09/2005 5:18:45 PM PDT by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

I personally believe this is a good thing. The car has a lot of safety mandated equipment. I believe that if the driver knows that in the event of a driving incident, the car will testify on exactly what the car was doing at the time, this could, if used properly, encourage the driver to drive more responsibly. I think the right to privacy folks will have a field day with this opinion.


7 posted on 10/09/2005 5:19:55 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: CBart95

The black boxes should be like any other evidence. If probable cause exists, then a subpeona should be used to see them. Having said that, people should know whether or not their vehicles have them and if so, they should disable them. And, under no circumstance should the guv't require them to be in a person's vehicle (I don't know if they do). I don't want the guv't telling me I have to carry a snitch tattletale around with me.


9 posted on 10/09/2005 5:24:06 PM PDT by umgud (Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

18MPH over the limit gets you a reckless homicide conviction and 2 years? that is crazy. most speed limits are set artificially low to encourage ticket revenue.


10 posted on 10/09/2005 5:25:21 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

all cars have them and they cannot be disabled.


11 posted on 10/09/2005 5:26:26 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Having done some late model hotrodding I know from experience that these devices are integral to the car's computer. Disabling it would also disable the car. The only way to get rid of it is to get the Government to mandate them into nonexistence. More Government regulation.
12 posted on 10/09/2005 5:27:42 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Certain_Doom

Arent there some devices that you can attach which will defeat the EDR? Seems that there was a thread on here a couple years ago. Either defeat it or allow you to erase it.....


13 posted on 10/09/2005 5:28:49 PM PDT by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Well this sure is a refreshing change from the open air asylum I just came out of where twerps have appointed themselves "the Warren Commission" on Hurricane Katrina and are hysterically screaming about their rights to draw and quarter the President of the United States.


14 posted on 10/09/2005 5:32:04 PM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Understand I'm not defending the court and I do not have a law degree but, the conditions were icy. If the speed limit is 40 under ideal conditions, the court can arbitrarily reduce the "safe" speed limit based on the reported conditions. This is why the arresting officer annotates the conditions on a ticket. Under adverse conditions, the limit could be set at say 20Mph, or 38Mph under her speed.
15 posted on 10/09/2005 5:33:29 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

I know Ben Mugged and you're no Ben Mugged.


16 posted on 10/09/2005 5:35:26 PM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
It's disturbing in a sense given that you cannot cross examine the data recorder and one should have to prove the recorder was functioning to specs and all code must be available for inspection. This is almost self-incrimination but driving is a privilege *not* a right, cars are regulated and licensed for emissions, safety. Drivers are licensed. So when considering the narrow scope of autos, I do not have a problem with this device being used in a court of law as a portion of evidence. I'd be more concerned and suspicious if it were the only evidence.

ALL drivers should be made aware of these devices at time of purchase and be required to initial their having been told about the device, its purposes and possible consequences.

17 posted on 10/09/2005 5:45:15 PM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75! Prolife? YES on Prop 73!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

depending on how the data is coded, magnetic laser etched I have a bulk tape eraser called a gauss generator that will scramble all information on a data machine I would assume they tape over everything at a certain time or you would have to change tapes.


18 posted on 10/09/2005 5:45:32 PM PDT by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Good thing.

Most people obey the law when they know they are being watched. Now, more drivers will know they are being watched.

The one thing that would be more effective is for all drivers to be armed. An armed society is a polite society.

19 posted on 10/09/2005 5:46:21 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Lt. Gen. Russel Honore to MSM: "You are stuck on stupid. Over.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv

The memory used is astatic RAM and is not sensitive to magnetism.


20 posted on 10/09/2005 5:48:40 PM PDT by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson