Skip to comments.
Putting Relativity To The Test, NASA's Gravity Probe B To Reveale If Einstein Was Right
Stanford University ^
| 10/3/2005
| Bob Kahn
Posted on 10/09/2005 2:43:18 PM PDT by Southack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"All your black holes are belong to us!"
21
posted on
10/09/2005 3:50:24 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
(Serving fresh wit everyday, for 36 years.)
To: Southack
With general relativity, Einstein forever changed our Newtonian view of gravity as a force, postulating rather that space and time are inextricably woven into a four-dimensional fabric called spacetime, and that gravity is simply the warping and twisting of the fabric of spacetime by massive celestial bodies. In order to come up with General Relativity, he had to develop a new branch of mathematics called Differential Geometry.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Einstein is what I usually call a "20-lb brain" type. He, together with Stephen Hawking, have changed radically the nature of science in the last 10 years.
23
posted on
10/09/2005 3:53:39 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
(Serving fresh wit everyday, for 36 years.)
To: JRios1968
He, together with Stephen Hawking, have changed radically the nature of science in the last 10 years.For Einstein, I think we could make that the last 100 years.
24
posted on
10/09/2005 4:03:43 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
SciencePing |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. See the list's explanation at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
25
posted on
10/09/2005 4:11:33 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, half-wit, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: Tijeras_Slim
I have to agree. Even if this doesn't work, it'll probably be NASA that messed up somewhere.
26
posted on
10/09/2005 4:15:14 PM PDT
by
Hyzenthlay
(Don't forget your towel!)
To: PatrickHenry
Arguments that this experiment is theoretically invalid should be made now, prior to the results being released.
Any arguments against this experiment that are delayed until after the results are known should be considered "sour grapes."
...otherwise we should all be prepared to accept their result.
Needless to say, I predict **much** gnashing of teeth and complaining once these results come out.
27
posted on
10/09/2005 4:19:15 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: JRios1968
Yep. It's amazing that all these years later, we're just now getting the technology to test Einstein's theories. And 80+ years after the fact, we're finding out that he was right all along! Here's an example:
The Bose - Einstein Condensate
To: Hyzenthlay
No doubt, I trust Einstein more than I trust NASA.
To: PatrickHenry
Gravitation is Just A Theorytm!
30
posted on
10/09/2005 4:24:50 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
To: King Prout
31
posted on
10/09/2005 4:33:11 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, half-wit, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: King Prout
Gravity is a myth; the Earth sucks.
32
posted on
10/09/2005 4:35:04 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Dawsonville_Doc
I dunno if you have already been pung to this, but I reckon you'd be interested
33
posted on
10/09/2005 4:35:16 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
To: inquest
If you are inside Einstein's famous falling room your local space will seem absolutely stationary and free of gravity. If the room is falling past you, the space inside will be moving while your own space will carry the gravitational field. Which is it? That is relativity.
34
posted on
10/09/2005 4:37:21 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: AntiGuv
naw... bazillions of minor angels busily keep objects from floating away.
35
posted on
10/09/2005 4:38:49 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
To: PatrickHenry
excellent parody.
adding it to my favorites file
36
posted on
10/09/2005 4:41:04 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(19sep05 - I want at least 2 Saiga-12 shotguns. If you have leads, let me know)
To: Right Wing Assault
Oops! I missed one "0" thanks for setting it straight.
37
posted on
10/09/2005 4:41:59 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
("Sharpie Diem": seize the marker.)
To: phantomworker
38
posted on
10/09/2005 4:44:15 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
( I won't respond to a troll, crackpot, half-wit, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: RightWhale
Perhaps I'm missing some element, but is that along the same lines as saying that if two objects, in the absence of any gravity, pass each other in space, there's no absolute way of saying that one's stationary, and the other moving?
39
posted on
10/09/2005 4:49:36 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Southack
Clearly there are "gaps" and "problems" with the theory of relativity. We must teach the controversy. A disclaimer is needed! Roll the presses!!
40
posted on
10/09/2005 4:50:13 PM PDT
by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson