Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Which begs the question: Did Freeh offer his Clinton-Khobar-Abdullah revelation during a closed door grilling by the 9/11 panel - whereupon the Commission decided to sweep the charge under the rug?

The 9/11 Commission covered-up every other blunder/crime of the Clintonistas, so it makes perfect sense that they did the same thing here.

1 posted on 10/09/2005 9:48:26 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
The 9/11 Omission missing something else? I'm shocked!
2 posted on 10/09/2005 9:52:22 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (We were promised someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold. Maybe next time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

"People should just stay out of our business." Thomas Kean.


3 posted on 10/09/2005 10:01:12 AM PDT by Roccus (Able Danger? What's an Able Danger?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
In public testimony before the Commission on April 13, 2004, Freeh didn't talk about Clinton hitting-up Abdullah for cash. If he had, it would have been front page news at the time.

So I guess the question is: Why did he do it now instead of then? Could it be that then he didn't have a book to promote? Oh, I'm sorry that was soooo cynical on my part :)

4 posted on 10/09/2005 10:01:30 AM PDT by upchuck (A fireman running up the stairs at the WTC as the towers began to collapse: HERO defined ~ Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I wonder if you could tie that into Able Danger and the China Connection which its looking like its going deeper than naming a few 9/11 hijackers.


5 posted on 10/09/2005 10:04:48 AM PDT by Thumbellina (As I recall, Kerry referred to terrorism as "overrated".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Which begs the question: Did Freeh offer his Clinton-Khobar-Abdullah revelation during a closed door grilling by the 9/11 panel - whereupon the Commission decided to sweep the charge under the rug?

Clinton would never offer this version of events. He has the unique ability to invent a reality that makes him look good and to really believe it. He's denying Freeh's version on TV tonight. Apparently (c)BS 60 Minutes will let Clinton have a rebuttal, something a Republican President would never get.

There's one question that tells us whose version is true: Did former President Bush get involved? I would love to see GHWB bury the Sink Meister on this simply by confirming Freeh contacted him and he interceded.

6 posted on 10/09/2005 10:46:41 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

bump


7 posted on 10/09/2005 12:28:27 PM PDT by RippleFire ("It's a joke, son!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The 9/11 Commission wholeheartedly endorses -


10 posted on 10/09/2005 4:58:09 PM PDT by sono (I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early. L Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Oh this is soooo good. Trouble is the media won't go after this one, so the people won't even know!


11 posted on 10/09/2005 4:58:49 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson