Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers attends church services in Texas [Episcopal? I thought she was evangelical?]
AP ^ | October 9 2005 | AP

Posted on 10/09/2005 9:31:33 AM PDT by freedomdefender

Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, accompanied by her brother and other members of her family, attended services at an Episcopal church near downtown Dallas on Sunday.

Miers smiled at reporters but did not stop to answer questions as she entered the Church of the Incarnation, which Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, and other well-known state politicians attend.

When asked by a reporter if she was surprised by the conservative reaction to her nomination, Miers replied, "Nice to see you."

...For years, Miers was a member of Valley View Christian Church in Dallas, but she and about 150 of its 1,200 active members have left the church to form a separate congregation, according to Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht. A friend of Miers, Hecht also is part of the breakaway group.

Valley View is part of a movement known as Christian Churches and Churches of Christ....As a child, Miers attended Roman Catholic and Protestant churches. In 1979, she was baptized at Valley View, and she later taught Sunday school classes there.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: ecusa; miers; valleyview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-227 next last
To: dubyaismypresident

because you weren't watching, you were participating!-


121 posted on 10/09/2005 10:52:36 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
What church she goes to is of no importance.

Quoted for verity.

122 posted on 10/09/2005 10:53:17 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Thank you. You da man.


123 posted on 10/09/2005 10:53:21 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

How did I not "get my facts straight"? It turns out, from another article, that she later went to an evangelical church. But the article I read and posted didn't mention that. Look, the relgion thing has been a big issue ever since it was leaked to Drudge (by the White House?) that's she's evangelical. I was therefore somewhat surprised to see her going to Episcopal church. That's all.


124 posted on 10/09/2005 10:53:34 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Chena; Miss Marple

Chena: I loved your post, especially point #5: Attending an Episcopal Church just to give her detractors something else to go nutso about


125 posted on 10/09/2005 10:54:03 AM PDT by GreyFriar (3rd Armored Division -- Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: nmh
He just says he cares till he gets in, then you can go pound sand up your you know what.
You have nothing meaningful to say, so you sink that that kind of imagery. You've reached a new low. Your posts are contemptible.
126 posted on 10/09/2005 10:54:24 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Presidential Infallability. Did you miss the Council of Trent here, too? ;^)

Actually that would be Vatican I, or maybe we call that "White House I" here. :)

127 posted on 10/09/2005 10:55:25 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (trust but verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Columbine; Jim Robinson

Just an observation but threads like this are why I find myself reading less and less.

I like Free Republic and have always read much more than I posted.

But these constant accusations about Bushbots, kool-aid drinkers, etc. etc. by the FR mafia has really cooled my desire to visit the site. Give it a rest!

The constant flaming by both sides of anyone who dares to stray from their preferred party line has really interferred with what I thought was the purpose of this website.

FR used to be a place to share information and read and participate in actual discussion. Apparently that is a lot less true now than it used to be.

Ok, flame away. It seems to be what many here do best.


128 posted on 10/09/2005 10:55:50 AM PDT by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Howlin
If I recall, I was the one who first posted the article on her going with a breakaway church. I also posted that I found this a good sign, because it shows she has convictions and she sticks with them.

Unlike a lot of FR posters, I have been supportive of this nomination, in general.

129 posted on 10/09/2005 10:56:23 AM PDT by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
We're not the ones preoccupied with her religious beliefs or practices.

The only reason we are even discussing this issue in the first place is because President Bush has insisted on highlighting this aspect of her life, because he has no other way of gulling overly credulous conservatives into supporting this woefully deficient nominee.

130 posted on 10/09/2005 10:56:45 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

As it has always been, as it is now. Talk with those who behave decently, ignore those who don't.


131 posted on 10/09/2005 10:57:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

,,, it is like a train wreck... watching people carry on about this.






Exactly.


132 posted on 10/09/2005 10:57:54 AM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
It turns out, from another article,

Can you show me where you linked to that other article so that we'd have all the facts?

And is this or is this not your thread title?

Miers attends church services in Texas [Episcopal? I thought she was evangelical?]

133 posted on 10/09/2005 10:59:03 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Naw, the Terri Schiavo case made this look like a game of tiddlywinks.


134 posted on 10/09/2005 10:59:33 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan

Exactly.


135 posted on 10/09/2005 11:00:03 AM PDT by bethtopaz (Even a fool is considered wise when he is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender; gondramB; starfish923; ex-snook; All

This is among the many important facts on this subject that you will find if you click on my screen name (linking you to my profile page):

Historic Protestant, Episcopalian doctrine is Reformed and Calvinistic. The Episcopalian church that adheres to its historic doctrine is still Reformed in the United States.

"Calvinism prevailed in England since it was the theology behind the Thirty-Nine Articles (1563) of the Church of England" (Paul Enns, *Moody Handbook of Theology*. Chicago: Moody Press, 1989), p. 476.

The Episcopalians held as their subordinate standards the 39 Articles of Religion. This confession is Calvinistic in emphasis.

During that historic period, not only the 39 Articles of Religion ("Episcopalians"), but whenever you read of the Waldensians, the Bohemian Brethren (in Poland), the Huguenots, you're reading of churches that were Calvinistic.

Historic Protestant, Episcopalian doctrine is Reformed and Calvinistic. The Episcopalian church that adheres to its historic doctrine is still Reformed in the United States.

X. OF FREE WILL. 39 Articles of Religion.

The condition of Man after the fall of Adam is such, that he cannot turn and prepare himself, by his own natural strength and good works, to faith, and calling upon God. Wherefore we have no power to do good works pleasant and acceptable to God, without the grace of God by Christ preventing us, that we may have a good will, and working with us, when we have that good will.

XVII. OF PREDESTINATION AND ELECTION

Predestination to Life is the everlasting purpose of God, whereby (before the foundations of the world were laid) he hath constantly decreed by his counsel secret to us, to deliver from curse and damnation those whom he hath chosen in Christ out of mankind, and to bring them by Christ to everlasting salvation, as vessels made to honour. Wherefore, they which be endued with so excellent a benefit of God, be called according to God's purpose by his Spirit working in due season: they through Grace obey the calling: they be justified freely: they be made sons of God by adoption: they be made like the image of his only- begotten Son Jesus Christ: they walk religiously in good works, and at length, by God's mercy, they attain to everlasting felicity.


136 posted on 10/09/2005 11:00:59 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

"So, you're a mind-reader too. You've got this all figured out. She goes to church with KBH and some others, obviously by invitation. Then she decides to go to her own cuhrch. And your pretty certain that Bush told her to do it. Your posts are a waste of pixels."

Hon, I think your mind is a "waste of pixels". I have brains; not pixels. It doesn't take a mental giant to figure out the cheap theatrics going on here. I'm sorry if all you have is "pixels" to offer for brains ... maybe that's why your so hostile towards those that disagree and see through this nonsense.


137 posted on 10/09/2005 11:01:05 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
I'm trusting President Bush on appointing Miss Miers to the supreme court. I like the concept that a non-elite school and work-a-day lawyer is being nominated to the court.

I agree.

138 posted on 10/09/2005 11:01:47 AM PDT by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nmh

You don't know what a pixel is, do ya? LOL


139 posted on 10/09/2005 11:02:14 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

bttt


140 posted on 10/09/2005 11:02:45 AM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson