To: Crackingham
Well, well......the HERO to all of us conservatives DOES NOT think Meirs to be a catostrophic nomination!!!
I guess everyone here who has given up on BUSH will just have to give up on Scalia.
After all he is NOT really a conservative in the mold of Thomas, now is he?
3 posted on
10/09/2005 9:13:13 AM PDT by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
To: PISANO
he is not commenting on her specific abilities - either way. its just a general comment.
4 posted on
10/09/2005 9:14:18 AM PDT by
oceanview
To: PISANO
Well, well......the HERO to all of us conservatives DOES NOT think Meirs to be a catostrophic nomination!!!
You argument is based on a logical fallacy.
Scalia did not defend the nomination of Harriet Miers. He merely rebuked criticizing a nominee for lacking judicial experience.
That is not at all the same thing as saying "Harriet Miers was a good choice."
I have never personally argued against her lack of experience on the bench specifically. What I take issue with is her complete lack of scholarship in Constitutional Law. And that is quite a different issue altogether.
73 posted on
10/09/2005 9:58:05 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
To: PISANO
Time to burn Scalia at the stack and drown him at the same time. He may be defending Miers.
83 posted on
10/09/2005 10:01:39 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Jamie Gorelick is responsible for more dead Americans(9-11) than those killed in Iraq.)
To: PISANO
After all he is NOT really a conservative in the mold of Thomas, now is he? I think Scalia voted against pornography.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson