[counterpunch]

Well, well......the HERO to all of us conservatives DOES NOT think Meirs to be a catostrophic nomination!!!

You argument is based on a logical fallacy.
Scalia did not defend the nomination of Harriet Miers. He merely rebuked criticizing a nominee for lacking judicial experience.
That is not at all the same thing as saying "Harriet Miers was a good choice."

I have never personally argued against her lack of experience on the bench specifically. What I take issue with is her complete lack of scholarship in Constitutional Law. And that is quite a different issue altogether.

[Howlin]

Scalia did not defend the nomination of Harriet Miers. He merely rebuked criticizing a nominee for lacking judicial experience.

Wow............aren't you dizzy from THAT spin?

[Raycpa]

What I take issue with is her complete lack of scholarship in Constitutional Law

Which candidates without judge experience would you recommend?