Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton aides battle Freeh over '60 minutes' book
drudgereport.com ^ | Oct 8, 2005 | Drudge

Posted on 10/08/2005 5:22:54 PM PDT by Zeppo

Under strong pressure from former President Bill Clinton's advisers, CBS's ''60 Minutes'' has agreed to read a statement denying an explosive charge being made on Sunday nght's program by former FBI director Louis Freeh, the WASHINGTON POST reports.

In the statement, Samuel ``Sandy'' Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, challenges Freeh's assertion that Clinton failed to press Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to cooperate with an investigation of the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in that country, and used the occasion to ask for a contribution to his presidential library. The Saudis made such a donation last year _ six years after the 1998 meeting.

Berger, who was at the meeting, said: ``The president strongly raised the need for Saudi officials to cooperate with us on the investigation into the attack on Khobar Towers at the time when the FBI was attempting to gain access to the suspects. The president did not raise in any fashion the issue of his library.''

Clinton spokesman Jay Carson said he told CBS's Mike Wallace that he had supportive accounts from five other former officials at the meeting, including those briefed about a private conversation between Clinton and Abdullah.

``The fair journalistic question is why they didn't call and get comments for their story from people who were in the room, such as Sandy Berger, and why they took until Friday afternoon to get that done,'' said Lanny Davis, a former White House lawyer, who tried to persuade ''60 Minutes'' producer Jeff Fager to allow him or another Clinton spokesman to appear on Sunday night's segment.

Carson, who called the Freeh book ``a total work of fiction.''

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; bookreview; clinton; clintonistas; drudge; freeh; myfbi; sandyberger; saudi; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last
To: Zeppo

Sandy Berger should be in Leavenworth doing hard time for treason, yet he will try to make people believe that Louis Freeh is a kook...Clinton hired him and prasied him until he wouldn't be a Clinton lap dog. CBS the lying Al Jezzera network of America...Where is Mike Wallace with the forged docs?
able


21 posted on 10/08/2005 5:36:53 PM PDT by abletruth (Liberals would Blame Bush For Their Bad Marriages...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
Right. We are going to believe the lying convicted felon, Sandy Berger.

"The president did not raise in any fashion the issue of his library.''


So, open the books to your LIEbrary Bubba and prove it! You lying scum.
22 posted on 10/08/2005 5:37:04 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Mia T; NautiNurse; ALOHA RONNIE; Howlin; Peach

ping


23 posted on 10/08/2005 5:37:06 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek

I remember Rush making the prediction. By this time next week, Freeh's life will be in shambles.


24 posted on 10/08/2005 5:37:19 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Hey, Ted "Drowning woman rights advocate" Kennedy is their spokesman too, so Sandy is no suprise to me!


25 posted on 10/08/2005 5:39:21 PM PDT by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
In the statement, Samuel ``Sandy'' Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, challenges Freeh's assertion that Clinton failed to press Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to cooperate with an investigation of the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers

In other news, 60 minutes has agreed to allow convicted murderer Charles Manson to rebuke an editorial condeming BTK killer Dennis Rader.

"These charges against Dennis, are like, TOTAL $#%&* man! You hear me!! I'll get my family and come visit you in the middle of the F_&*$#@ night!!


26 posted on 10/08/2005 5:40:35 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I don't think they can pull this one off -- people are far more aware and of course we have the internet.


27 posted on 10/08/2005 5:40:44 PM PDT by Patriotic Bostonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Patriotic Bostonian

By the time the segment finally airs, the gist will be "It's Bush's fault".


28 posted on 10/08/2005 5:42:53 PM PDT by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo

Sandy Berger, even though he got a slap on the wrist for destroying classified documents, is still a criminal. What I can't understand is why clintoon and his cronies get away with committing every crime conceivable, yes even murder, and never get any pen time. What is it that makes these terrible people so special?


29 posted on 10/08/2005 5:43:15 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
``The fair journalistic question is why they didn't call and get comments for their story from people who were in the room, such as Sandy Berger, and why they took until Friday afternoon to get that done,'' said Lanny Davis...

Sandy Berger...Lanny Davis: that's rich. Who would believe either of them.

I am just as sure they'd be willing to give "comments" as I am sure they would lie without blinking an eye.
30 posted on 10/08/2005 5:43:36 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Not only that, but when it was revealed what Burglar did, Clinton made him out to be an inept buffoon. Which of course he is.

As Rush said, when it comes to believing Freeh or Bubba is there really a choice? I really had problems with the fact that Freeh seemed to turn a blind eye in the Clintons direction but maybe now we'll find out why.


31 posted on 10/08/2005 5:44:05 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

we needed Freeh in front of a grand jury or a congressional hearing - not on a book tour and on 60 minutes. his stories will have no legs unfortunately.


32 posted on 10/08/2005 5:44:41 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
Ask 60 minutes tell them what you think of a convicted felon standing and vouching for a convicted perjurer.

60m@cbsnews.com

33 posted on 10/08/2005 5:44:44 PM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice
Er, Sandy, why are you wearing white paper socks with a black suit?

Berger's socks make "crinkling" noises when he walks.
34 posted on 10/08/2005 5:45:03 PM PDT by hummingbird (21st Century Newsreporting - "Don't get me started!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo

Check Sandy's shorts for corroborating data...(it's a dirty job, but someone's gotsta do it).


35 posted on 10/08/2005 5:46:04 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo

Sure hope Burglar doesn't speed on his way to '60 minutes'........he's still on probation!

He's an (in)credible witness...............LOL


36 posted on 10/08/2005 5:46:54 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Outraged about a crescent at Flight 93 Memorial? Call 1-814- 443-4557 to leave comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
Free was a hapless FBI director, but I doubt he's an idiot.

He had to know this was coming, let's see what happens.

37 posted on 10/08/2005 5:47:49 PM PDT by lawnguy (It works Napoleon, you don't even know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo; All
CBS's ''60 Minutes'' has agreed to read a statement denying an explosive charge being made on Sunday night's program

billy should of had them read this one.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky." (Washington, D.C., January 26, 1998)

38 posted on 10/08/2005 5:48:48 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Carson, who called the Freeh book ``a total work of fiction.''

Leave it to the liar-in-chief's hired liar to overstate his case, and therefore to discredit his own statement. All that it takes is one counterexample (or ten, or one hundred), of other stories in Freeh's book that have lots of independent corroboration to show that the book is indeed credible, and that as usual the CYA spin from the Clinton camp is false.

39 posted on 10/08/2005 5:50:53 PM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy

Freeh has no one to back him up. No one from the clinton administration will, and unfortunately no one from the Bush administration either. He's a man without a country. Unless he has some hard documentation.


40 posted on 10/08/2005 5:51:00 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson