Posted on 10/08/2005 12:09:57 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
"Drudge is on Hitlary's payroll."
But Rush had Drudge substitute for him when he was in the hospital... Are you sure?
Through their prejudice they only take care of their own kind.
"In this case, Hillary's finance director literally worked in my offices and witnessed and enabled all my payments on Hillary's behalf. There has never been a question of "authorizing" my contributions, only of reporting the ones I made, legally."
Thanks for that response.
If the campaign admits that you legitimately made all those expenditures on their behalf and they agree with the amounts, I don't see how they have any defense for reporting a lower numbers.
Do you have anything where they signed off on all those expenses? That would be helpful.
.....What I want to see printed is her Thesis!.....
Want to start a pool?
When will be the most damaging time? March 2006 or say april 2008?
I think it is out there just waiting for the most appropriate moment.
The reporter did not miss the story. The reporter deliberately tried to hide the real story in convoluted screed deliberately designed to confuse the non politically astute. Her objective was to make the average voter confused about what really happened and to thus instill the idea of this is "just politics as usual." This is actually the Washington Posts attempt to put this issue in the past.
I don't see an April Witt on the staff at the Washington Post. At any rate, she was a good girl. There are rewards to be had in painting the Clintons with a favorable brush, and punishments to be rendered should one cross their path too closely.
Two-bit hillbilly thugs at work in the highest places. Who would've thought?
Not the current AG. All anybody needs to do is look at how the U. S. Attorney's office took a dive at Rosen's trial. Toward the ent the gov. atty. even said Hillary didn't benefit from what Rosen did.
Oh boy, who has it? Yes, let's start a pool. Didn't the lady who died on the DC flight on 9/11 have her thesis and if so couldn't her hubby find it?
Peter, In what court will the civil trial be held, and, do you expect a court date before the Nov. 2006 elections?
"Had Ms. Witt done her job competently,"
Congressman, I must beg to respectfully disagree with you. Ms. Witt had half her twits about her and did her job most competently.
Unfortunately, her job was polishing 'RAT droppings, not journalism. She lives in denial if she privately considers herself anything other than a hack and a fraud.
Please reference via "italics" the reply to postings as I have with this one.
It makes it so much easier to reply in a timely fashion. : )
Which Klintoon?...OTOH, Don't answer...chil'ren may be present.
Ihave asked the question several times and never got a satisfactory answer. I think Liz Knows... but she won't tell.:-)
I concluded it is under constant guard by one of the good guys,to be presented at the time and place where it will do the most damage.
I refuse to believe it was destroyed for all time.
Hell Rush had Chris Matthews sub for him, what does that matter.
Lets hope your right!
I didn't know that. That does kind of blow the Drudge argument.
".....What I want to see printed is her Thesis!....."
When will be the most damaging time? March 2006 or say april 2008?
I think it is out there just waiting for the most appropriate moment.
***Hillary Clinton must be defeated in '06 because that will significantly diminish her political leverage for '08. What is just mind boggling is that her NY constituency KNOWS Hillary is powerlusting carpetbagging garbage, and yet they will still vote for her.
'06 NY senate campaign: Support Jeanine Pirro against Hillary Clinton.
It's fun to ridicule the Post reporter over this story. But it accomplishes nothing. It was Gonzales' Justice Department which inexplicably yanked Peter Paul's videotaped evidence which by all accounts would have convicted Rosen for sure. Even the RAT-appointed judge was stunned by this surrender. Like the Sandy Berger wrist-slap for treason/conspiracy, it was yet another disturbing Bush Administration intervention to rescue the Clintons from certain doom. The question is WHY?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.