Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker

no, your inferred opinion that Meirs was questionable based on Warren being her favorite justice is ridiculous.....like the pro-life issue was the only one Meirs thought of to determine a favorite justice.


285 posted on 10/06/2005 9:42:55 PM PDT by griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: griffin
no, your inferred opinion that Meirs was questionable based on Warren being her favorite justice is ridiculous.....like the pro-life issue was the only one Meirs thought of to determine a favorite justice.

What do you think she is most likely to have admired about Warren Burger, that would cause her to pass on more congenially conservative picks such as Scalia or Rehnquist?

291 posted on 10/06/2005 9:45:46 PM PDT by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

To: griffin

First, you are misrepresentaing my position.

I stated Democrats have lied about discussions with Roberts, so this is an alleged conversation he had with Miers until she either confirms or denies it.

Second, if you think naming a Justice that vote for R v W is inconsequential, you are wrong. No one has stated that would be the only reason to support a Justice, but nevertheless, it raises questions. Questions anyone has the right to ask.


294 posted on 10/06/2005 9:47:16 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson