[Soul Seeker]

First, you are misrepresentaing my position.

I stated Democrats have lied about discussions with Roberts, so this is an alleged conversation he had with Miers until she either confirms or denies it.

Second, if you think naming a Justice that vote for R v W is inconsequential, you are wrong. No one has stated that would be the only reason to support a Justice, but nevertheless, it raises questions. Questions anyone has the right to ask.

[griffin]

yeah...and i think that to answer those questions you should do a little more to educate yourself on Ms.Meirs fruit before you call your sister in Christ to the carpet in front of others and do harm in other's eyes to what could be a very strong ally.

[griffin]

yeah...and i think that to answer those questions you should do a little more to educate yourself on Ms.Meirs fruit before you call your sister in Christ to the carpet in front of others and do harm in other's eyes to what could be a very strong ally.

What your doing is nothing more than gossiping about things you have no concrete evidence of. Your hypothesizing!