Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers is dead in the water
Town Hall ^ | 10/06/05 | Laura Hollis

Posted on 10/06/2005 7:15:47 PM PDT by jdhljc169

Today's Chronicle of Higher Education has a story that describes Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers' involvement with a lecture series at her alma mater, SMU Law School. The inaugural lecturer? Gloria Steinem. I've played these games in law schools, and this story sends up red flags for me. Here's my take on it ...

I was reserving judgment, but after having read the Chronicle article (and given conservatives' skittishness about her already), I think she's a non-starter. Miers may be a very nice person - and by all accounts she is. But she has never served as a judge, and while I do not think that an attorney must have been a judge in order to be an excellent justice, I do think that if you want to be certain of a nominee's views on the proper role of the judiciary, you better have seen them in action as a judge.

We haven't. And absent that, we must look to other events in Miers' professional life to ascertain her perspective. To that end, the Chronicle article is instructive:

In the late 1990s, as a member of the advisory board for Southern Methodist University's law school, Ms. Miers pushed for the creation of an endowed lecture series in women's studies named for Louise B. Raggio, one of the first women to rise to prominence in the Texas legal community ...Ms. Miers, whom President Bush announced on Monday as his choice to fill the Supreme Court seat being vacated by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, not only advocated for the lecture series, but also gave money and solicited donations to help get it off the ground ... A feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, delivered the series's first lecture, in 1998. In the following two years, the speakers were Patricia S. Schroeder, the former Democratic congresswoman widely associated with women's causes, and Susan Faludi, the author of Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women (1991). Ann W. Richards, the Democrat whom George W. Bush unseated as governor of Texas in 1994, delivered the lecture in 2003.

Having served on the faculties of three law schools, I can tell you that if you are an academic of the conservative political persuasion, this is the way you play the game: you call things by the terms the liberal academic establishment uses ("Gender Studies," "Women's Studies," etc.) and then you bring in lecturers and provide content that challenges their prevailing "wisdom."

There must be dozens -- hundreds -- thousands -- of conservative female attorneys, politicians, pundits and successful business owners in this country who would be wonderful role models for female SMU law students. If Miers pushed for the creation of a lecture series to honor Texas' first and finest female attorneys, and the series brought in the likes of Steinem and Faludi, then I know as much as I need to know about this woman.

Stick a fork in her. She's done.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: harrietmiers; harrietthemere; miers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461 next last
To: SpringheelJack

If she was active in the pro-life movement, why would she pick him? His pro-Roe vote has to be one of the most well-known events of his tenure, if not the most well-known.
***
Besides that, she said Warren. How many people call justices by their first name. I never say Antonin, I always say Scalia.


421 posted on 10/07/2005 5:22:48 AM PDT by jdhljc169
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

But she did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night.


422 posted on 10/07/2005 5:24:59 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I wish I knew whether this appointment was who the President truly thought was best, who he thought was the best who had a chance with a very weak Senate, or just loyalty to a friend.

Problem is that if he explains his strategy (or strategery, if you like) to us, he's also explaining it to the Democrats.

423 posted on 10/07/2005 5:25:48 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Babu
experience and training in the nuances of the law for the position.

You think Bush should nominate Kerry? ;-)

424 posted on 10/07/2005 5:30:06 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
To find out more... marry me.

Exactly. Excellent.

425 posted on 10/07/2005 5:34:28 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

check, please.


426 posted on 10/07/2005 5:38:25 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

Who refers to Burger as "Warren?" I call Barbra Streisand.


427 posted on 10/07/2005 5:43:03 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
I share the angst over O'connor these many years, but the fact is, that finding a woman who will not let her personal belief system affect her judgment is quite a task.

JRB, Priscilla Owen, Edith Jones, etc. I found plenty.

428 posted on 10/07/2005 5:45:14 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: phelanw
James Burham, in Suicide of the West defines "ideologue" as someone beyond reason, someone for whom no learning, no new facts, no conceivable development would cause him to re-examine his position (or constellation of positions). Many people still use it a pejorative.
429 posted on 10/07/2005 5:46:11 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: BushMeister
"If Miers created the lecture series and solicited donations for it, one would have to assume that she had input as to who gave the lectures."

I would add even if initial input was not given, approval of those moon bats certainly was.
430 posted on 10/07/2005 5:46:31 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

A young 60???? Shelooks like she is 75!


431 posted on 10/07/2005 5:50:15 AM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his countary" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jdhljc169

Who is LOUISE B. RAGGIO? Divorce lawyer?

LOUISE B. RAGGIO

Attorney in private practice with Raggio and Raggio since 1956. (Members of the firm include three lawyer sons: Grier H. Jr., Thomas L. and Kenneth G.)

Graduated from University of Texas at Austin with highest honors, Phi Beta Kappa; Graduate work at American University in Washington, D.C. under Rockefeller Fellowship; Southern Methodist University, J.D., 1952. Assistant District Attorney of Dallas County 1954-56.

Past Chairman of the Family Law Section of the American Bar Association 1975-76. Drafting Committee for ABA Committee on Uniform Marriage and Divorce Laws 1969-73. Governor of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 1973-81. Trustee of American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Foundation 1991-94. Trustee, National Conference of Bar Foundations 1986-92.

Past Chairman of the Family Law Section of the State Bar of Texas 1965-67 and Drafting Committee for Family Code 1966-75.

Director, State Bar of Texas 1979-82. First woman ever elected as a Director in the 100 year history of the Texas Bar. Trustee, Texas Bar Foundation 1982-86 and Chairman of the Board 1984-85; Chairman, Capital Fund Drive 1986-87. First woman ever elected Trustee. Chair Fellows of Texas Bar Foundation 1993-94.

Recipient of professional awards: State Bar of Texas Citation of Merit for Family Code 1967; State Bar of Texas Presidents' Award as outstanding lawyer of year 1987; SMU Distinguished Law Alumni Award 1992; State Bar of Texas Sarah T. Hughes outstanding attorney award 1993; Dallas Bar Association First Outstanding Trial Lawyer Award 1993; Dallas Bar Foundation Distinguished Career Award 1997; Texas Bar Foundation Ethics & Professionalism Award 1997; North Texas Legal Services Equal Justice Award 1997; Honorary LL.D. from Southern Methodist University 1996.

Life Fellow of American Bar Foundation, Dallas Bar Foundation and Fellow Emeritus Texas Bar Foundation.

Texas Women's Hall of Fame inductee (Legal Category) 1985.

Recipient of various awards such as Zonta Award for community service 1970; SMU Alumni Award 1972; Extra Mile Award for leadership in law reform affecting women 1974; Women's Center Award 1979; Texas Federation of Business and Professional Women's Clubs Woman of the Year 1985; International Women's Forum "Woman That Has Made a Difference" Award 1990; National Business Women Owners Association Award 1994; American Civil Liberties Union Thomas Jefferson award 1994; Girls, Inc. Award 1995; North Texas Association of Women Journalists Courage award 1995; Texas Trailblazer Award 1996; Austin Texas High School Distinguished Alumni Award 1998; Veteran Feminist of America Award 1999

Margaret Brent Outstanding Woman Lawyer award from American Bar Association 1995.

Dallas Women Lawyers and National Business Women Owners Association each have established "Louise B. Raggio" awards given annually to outstanding women. Southern Methodist University has an annual "Louise Ballerstedt Raggio Lecture" series.

Listed in The Best Lawyers in America and various law lists for many years.

Listed in Who's Who in America for many years.


432 posted on 10/07/2005 5:51:08 AM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

So, Miers and Leahy had this chat in 1985/86?


433 posted on 10/07/2005 5:51:08 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Woh, a women's studies lecture series had a bunch of yappy women give lecture, gosh that's never happened before.

How stupid was she not to realize yappy women would benefit from this program she wanted set up?

434 posted on 10/07/2005 5:52:36 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
They don't even have to lie to be wrong on this.

several people with knowledge of the exchange

They're quoting unnamed people who presumably got the information they're passing on from Leahy.

435 posted on 10/07/2005 5:53:36 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]


436 posted on 10/07/2005 5:56:36 AM PDT by Rebelbase ("There are millions of mediocre Americans, and they, too, deserve to be represented in the USSC. -RH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

I'm happy that you are amazed. That way every day is a new day.


437 posted on 10/07/2005 5:59:53 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Law is not as complicated as lawyers would like for us to believe. Most of what you pay them for are to make sure forms (designed by bureaucrats) are completed properly, or to verify that required boilerplate is included in a contract.

Top level executives have as much practice in that sort of thing as any lawyer. Plus, they've been making a myriad of real-life decisions every day for years and years as they moved up the ladder.

438 posted on 10/07/2005 6:06:18 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
"You are aware that Harriet Miers was the lead attorney in the litigation to resolve emminent domain claims after Bush's benefactors had put together his deal with the Texas Rangers?"

If this is true I hope some Senator questions her on this.

Troubling if she thinks the Kelo case is grounded in law.

Miers would look like a huge hypocrite going against something she fought hard for and if she has no problem with Kelo what does that say about her. After all, if above is true she had no problem using the EM law in a devious manner (Sorry, Stadiums are far different than public roads etc...). Troubling indeed.
439 posted on 10/07/2005 6:07:42 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
EM= ED (Eminent domain)
440 posted on 10/07/2005 6:10:10 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson