To: wallcrawlr; DaveLoneRanger
2 posted on
10/06/2005 6:36:47 AM PDT by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Everyone knows "real" scientists don't believe in God.
3 posted on
10/06/2005 6:42:14 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Since it can't be proven, what does it matter what anyone believes?
6 posted on
10/06/2005 6:44:14 AM PDT by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Those who seek proof don't understand the meaning of "faith."
11 posted on
10/06/2005 6:48:21 AM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Free Speech is a Right. Being Wrong is Just...Wrong.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
He will give a speech at a luncheon from noon to 1 p.m. titled Finding God at Berkeley.Good luck with that...
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Good article Michael_Michaelangelo, very interesting.
Thanks wallcrawlr for the ping.
22 posted on
10/06/2005 7:05:05 AM PDT by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
...hmm....by design?.....or accident?...
33 posted on
10/06/2005 7:39:46 AM PDT by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Memos on Bush Are Fake but Accurate". NYTimes)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
35 posted on
10/06/2005 7:41:14 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Always, always I have thought that it was absurd for
biologists to make assertions about the origins of the species and point to an accidental planet full of life...
If any scientist will find the face of God--it won't be a geneticist or anthropologist, they think too small--it'll be the physicist.
51 posted on
10/06/2005 8:07:13 AM PDT by
Mamzelle
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
The interesting thing in this and the transcipt of what Fritz said in the Leadership U lecture is how little he actually said. All one can really tell is that he believes in the Big Bang and that he thinks the ripples might have a divine origin. The rest is an attempt by Schaefer to interpret some ambiguously deistic musings on the part of physicists in the most religious possible light. Fine, he's allowed. But gosh, there is nothing here that a majority of the evos on this board couldn't agree with; and there's nothing I personally I find objectionable.
To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; mercygrace; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping.
What! A noted, intelligent, worthy scientist who - [gasp!] believes in God. And that God created things, like the universe. Hmmm. Read thread at own risk.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
66 posted on
10/06/2005 9:12:53 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Scientist defends Big Bang and God ]
Which God.?. The big bang is a Hindu mental figment.. In an almost endless array of convoluted cycles.. You know, the religion that proudly produced the caste system.. that one.. from an area where the Hindu and Muslim religions dominate..
Hindu and Muslim mind you.. My dog has more morality than the Hindu and Muslim religions have in their back hooves..
70 posted on
10/06/2005 9:29:52 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
101 posted on
10/06/2005 8:34:48 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(The radical secularization of America is happening)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
103 posted on
10/07/2005 6:02:09 AM PDT by
SealSeven
(Moving at the speed of dark.... Even "nothing" takes up space.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson