Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: areafiftyone
Mr. Wannabe jumped out against the President on Meiers, and now he's breaking his campaign promises too.
Something tells me his dreams are coming to an end.
4 posted on
10/06/2005 6:30:01 AM PDT by
OldFriend
(One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
To: areafiftyone
This is exactly why Senators never win the White House. They have all these different votes that can be twisted many different ways.
6 posted on
10/06/2005 6:33:17 AM PDT by
GianniV
To: areafiftyone
In order for America to descend to the next level
certain voices must be silenced.
7 posted on
10/06/2005 6:35:12 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
To: areafiftyone
... "When I ran for the U.S. Senate in 2000, I stated numerous times that I would support adding 'sexual orientation' to the category of 'hate crimes,'...
Scratch this turkey of the list.
With Republicans like this, who needs Bolsheviks?
To: areafiftyone
I see a 3 way race go into the peak primaries with Allen, Romney, and Gulianni.
To: EDINVA; iceskater; xyz123; Mudboy Slim; Corin Stormhands; jla; Flora McDonald; GeorgeW23225; ...
19 posted on
10/06/2005 6:49:24 AM PDT by
Corin Stormhands
(You are stuck on stupid, I’m not going to answer that question ~ General Honore)
To: areafiftyone
To: areafiftyone
Once again, it depends on what the meaning of "is" is.
To: areafiftyone
Indexing to
Allen2008
President2008
32 posted on
10/06/2005 7:06:46 AM PDT by
JohnnyZ
("I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country" -- Mitt Romney)
To: areafiftyone
George Allen in 2008
Next!
40 posted on
10/06/2005 7:22:12 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
To: areafiftyone
Those who are eligible to be "hate criminals" have a lower crime rate than those who are eligible to be "hate crime victims".
The purpose of the hate crime policies has more to do with creating a perception that the crimes committed by those who are eligible "hate crime victims" are somehow less severe..."love crimes", perhaps.
What is needed is "anti-genocide legislation" that will compare race on race crime. When it is established that one race commits twice as many murders against another race than vice versa, a more severe penalty should be given to a member of that race with twice the rate of murderers. This will prevent slow and quiet holocausts.
48 posted on
10/06/2005 7:44:37 AM PDT by
Jim_Curtis
(How do we prevent someone from torching his city if he will be rewarded as a lottery winner?)
To: areafiftyone
He is, after all, a politician.
50 posted on
10/06/2005 7:45:47 AM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: areafiftyone
Sigh. Another one bites the dust.
51 posted on
10/06/2005 7:48:00 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: All
Living in VA, of course I am? (was?... not sure), in favor of Sen Allen... but frankly I am begining to wonder about this guy. If he were 'my kind' of politician, he would take a stand on issues and clarify doubs that I am sure his people already know we are wondering about instead of just 'calibrating' each position for political advantage. is he one of ours? or not?.
Last time I heard he was ready to talk to Mrs. Sheehan... I wonder what he wanted to talk to her about?... hmmm....
56 posted on
10/06/2005 7:56:08 AM PDT by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
To: areafiftyone
The effort to create a "Hate Crime" law is directed toward one object: to give government police state authority over every human action of every citizen.
George Orwell's book "1984" nightmare has become a reality when BigGov can say: "We are going to deprive you of your freedom and liberty because we know what you were thinking."
We know this is true because hate is an emotion, it is not quantifiable, nor can hate be measured as to degree of motivation for an act. No one can look into the human mind and tell what the emotion of the moment is or was.
Such a law can have only one purpose and that is to give government the justification to do anything to anyone under the guise that the person committed a "Hate" crime.
Hate is a legitimate human emotion without which man could not survive.
We come nearer to the police state where what is not compulsory is prohibited.
To: areafiftyone
The effort to create a "Hate Crime" law is directed toward one object: to give government police state authority over every human action of every citizen.
George Orwell's book "1984" nightmare has become a reality when BigGov can say: "We are going to deprive you of your freedom and liberty because we know what you were thinking."
We know this is true because hate is an emotion, it is not quantifiable, nor can hate be measured as to degree of motivation for an act. No one can look into the human mind and tell what the emotion of the moment is or was.
Such a law can have only one purpose and that is to give government the justification to do anything to anyone under the guise that the person committed a "Hate" crime.
Hate is a legitimate human emotion without which man could not survive.
We come nearer to the police state where what is not compulsory is prohibited.
To: areafiftyone
The effort to create a "Hate Crime" law is directed toward one object: to give government police state authority over every human action of every citizen.
George Orwell's book "1984" nightmare has become a reality when BigGov can say: "We are going to deprive you of your freedom and liberty because we know what you were thinking."
We know this is true because hate is an emotion, it is not quantifiable, nor can hate be measured as to degree of motivation for an act. No one can look into the human mind and tell what the emotion of the moment is or was.
Such a law can have only one purpose and that is to give government the justification to do anything to anyone under the guise that the person committed a "Hate" crime.
Hate is a legitimate human emotion without which man could not survive.
We come nearer to the police state where what is not compulsory is prohibited.
To: areafiftyone
The effort to create a "Hate Crime" law is directed toward one object: to give government police state authority over every human action of every citizen.
George Orwell's book "1984" nightmare has become a reality when BigGov can say: "We are going to deprive you of your freedom and liberty because we know what you were thinking."
We know this is true because hate is an emotion, it is not quantifiable, nor can hate be measured as to degree of motivation for an act. No one can look into the human mind and tell what the emotion of the moment is or was.
Such a law can have only one purpose and that is to give government the justification to do anything to anyone under the guise that the person committed a "Hate" crime.
Hate is a legitimate human emotion without which man could not survive.
We come nearer to the police state where what is not compulsory is prohibited.
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Any elected official who votes to include "sexual orientation" as a protected class under a so-called hate crimes bill is no conservative. Or any special group. Then entire concept of "hate crimes" is non-conservative and repellent. It means some groups of humans are more worthy than others.
In any trial, it's obvious that if the crime is particularly cruel, or the victim helpless, that will be taken into consideration at the time of sentencing, or should be. The is absolutely no reason to mandate special groups as worthy of sacred status as victims, it is an odious concept. And to include homosexuals is the heighth of insult to everyone.
Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
69 posted on
10/06/2005 8:43:29 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: areafiftyone
Where are all the "Allen/Rice 2008" pimps now?
Senators have never won a presidency since JFK, and even he didn't really win thanks to election fraud.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson