Skip to comments.
This is what 'advice and consent' means (Ann Coulter)
wnd.com ^
| October 5, 2005
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 10/05/2005 4:03:47 PM PDT by perfect stranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,101-1,117 next last
To: flashbunny
I could easily have said it was 70% for Miers or are with holding judgement versus 25% who do not support her at all.
481
posted on
10/05/2005 5:57:45 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(This space waiting for a post election epiphany it now is: Question Everything)
To: flashbunny
I see, so even in the subgroup, you Moonbats garner only 23.3%.
Wow, thanks. It's good to see what a small minority you are.
482
posted on
10/05/2005 5:57:46 PM PDT
by
KingKongCobra
(Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
To: perfect stranger
I know conservatives have been trained to hate people who went to elite universities, and generally that's a good rule of thumb. But not when it comes to the Supreme Court. Excuse me, Ann, but that's BS.
483
posted on
10/05/2005 5:57:59 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: flashbunny
It's the personal attacks, right?Get off decrying personal attacks, already. Coulter saw fit to attack President Bush about "boozing" and attacked Miers' for being nice but not smart (which is patently false).
Yes, I've seen you sneer that the same people citing Miers' Christianity are "attacking" Ann, but the issue is Ann's attack on the President and Miers.
To: Miss Marple
I guess I will need to pay more attention to Howard and find out what he is saying lately. I didn't realize he was beginning to sound more like Ann. If that's that case, that's a good thing! ;-)
485
posted on
10/05/2005 5:58:17 PM PDT
by
dmw
To: manwiththehands
Ironically, this selection is virtually identical to the process that resulted in Cheney's selection as Bush's running mate in 2000. In both cases Bush named someone to lead the effort to find a candidate, then ended up naming that person to the job.
486
posted on
10/05/2005 5:58:20 PM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: Neets
What did SHE personally do to get Clinton impeached?I'd like to know that too.
Damn, you learn something new every day around here.
To: dinok
You're right on! The Bush administration is a spent force. I heard Miers address a group of Republican lawyers. It was broadcast on C-Span yesterday. Shallow, boring platitudes. She was asked three softball questions afterward. She stumbled over her answers which were generally vacuous. The Senators will skin her alive.
To: Miss Marple
Engaging a little hyperbole on your own. I see. ;)
489
posted on
10/05/2005 5:58:48 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(A Plaming Democrat gathers no votes)
To: KingKongCobra
I hate to compare them but Ann is starting to show signs of Adrianna Huffington disease. Concur, although Ann only has symptoms so far whereas Adrianna is terminal.
To: ConsentofGoverned
Case law was relatively simple until the Ivy League geniuses got a hold of it around 1940.
To: ConsentofGoverned
. . . case law is very complex today . . . Yeah, but it doesn't have to be.
If Cliff-Notes are longer than the books they are supposed to summarize, then they'd be the most useless publications ever printed.
492
posted on
10/05/2005 6:00:28 PM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: Alberta's Child
493
posted on
10/05/2005 6:00:49 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
To: dirtboy
Yeah, it's staggering to see folks like Coulter basically buy into the left-wing notion that only super-brains can run this country, when all the experiences of the last 50 years proves exactly the opposite After she sees how little we the people value her and her elitist friends she will go native on us.
To: dirtboy
"I wish I had a buck for every time I've seen a liberal call Clarence Thomas an idiot. And now Ann might as well join them."
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
To: WestSylvanian
The Senators will skin her alive.Hopefully the Republicans will, because Harry Reid sure won't be.
496
posted on
10/05/2005 6:01:37 PM PDT
by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: sinkspur
If she did, indeed, call for this Listen to it ... she mentioned it about 4 or 5 times
497
posted on
10/05/2005 6:03:27 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: dirtboy
But, hey, Thomas is the lightweight and Scalia is the brilliant scolar.
She's no Thomas either..and no one can expect to agree with every decision made by any judge or even President BUSH..I don't, but come on, miers is the best he got??
if you believe that then you are not aware of the other jurists available (which i doubt). Running for 5 YEARS the texas lotto speaks volumes to me about her christian conversion (FAKE IMO)..she is a classic ride the coat tails pol. and you see her on SCOTUS please.
498
posted on
10/05/2005 6:03:56 PM PDT
by
ConsentofGoverned
(A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
To: AZ_Cowboy
Take it with humor and laughter.
499
posted on
10/05/2005 6:04:05 PM PDT
by
perfect stranger
("Hell Bent for Election" by Warburg)
To: Wormwood
Hopefully the Republicans will, because Harry Reid sure won't be.The Dems are already starting to backtrack as they find out more about Miers.
Apparently some folks on the right are too dense to understand what that means.
500
posted on
10/05/2005 6:04:31 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drool overflowed my buffer...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,101-1,117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson