Posted on 10/04/2005 10:43:26 PM PDT by j.frank.dobie
Prosecutor reveals third grand jury had refused DeLay indictment Newly impaneled grand jury returned money-laundering charge within hours
By Laylan Copelin
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
A Travis County grand jury last week refused to indict former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay as prosecutors raced to salvage their felony case against the Sugar Land Republican.
In a written statement Tuesday, Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle acknowledged that prosecutors presented their case to three grand juries — not just the two they had discussed — and one grand jury refused to indict DeLay. When questions arose about whether the state's conspiracy statute applied to the first indictment returned last Wednesday, prosecutors presented a new money-laundering charge to second grand jury on Friday because the term of the initial grand jury had expired.
Working on its last day Friday, the second grand jury refused to indict DeLay. Normally, a "no-bill" document is available at the courthouse after such a decision. No such document was released Tuesday.
Earle's statement on Tuesday said he took money-laundering and conspiracy charges to a third grand jury on Monday after prosecutors learned of new evidence over the weekend.
Lawyers for DeLay immediately called foul after Earle released his statement after 5 p.m. Tuesday.
"What could have happened over the weekend?" said Austin lawyer Bill White, who represents DeLay. "They investigate for three years and suddenly they have new evidence? That's beyond the pale!"
White suggested that Earle released his statement Tuesday because he feared reporters would learn about the no-bill.
In his statement, Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret.
DeLay's legal team, led by Houston lawyer Dick DeGuerin, has been taking to the airwaves to portray Earle as an incompetent prosecutor who is pursuing DeLay only as a political vendetta.
"It just gets worse and worse," DeGuerin said. "He's gone to three grand juries over four days. Where does it stop?"
The first grand jury, impaneled by state District Judge Mike Lynch, a Democrat, had spent six months hearing evidence that Republican groups had violated a state ban against spending corporate money in the 2002 campaigns, including the exchange of $190,000 of corporate money for the same amount of campaign donations from the Republican National Committee.
The grand jury indicted DeLay on charges of conspiring to violate the state election laws, a state-jail felony. As DeLay's lawyers waited to raise an issue whether the conspiracy law applied to the election code, prosecutors apparently learned of the issue.
According to Earle's Tuesday statement, prosecutors presented "some evidence" to a second grand jury impaneled by District Judge Julie Kocurek, a Republican, "out of an abundance of caution."
It's unclear whether those grand jurors refused to indict DeLay on money-laundering charges, a first-degree felony, because of the evidence or because it was given to them on the last day of their 90-day term.
Earle did not say in his statement what new evidence surfaced over the weekend. White, who said he doubts the evidence exists, challenged Earle to reveal it. Prosecutors also called Lynch's grand jurors over the weekend to poll them on how they would have voted on money-laundering charges if they had been given the chance.
Then prosecutors tried again Monday with a new grand jury.
When Monday's grand jury, impaneled by District Judge Brenda Kennedy, a Democrat, reported for its first day, Earle was there to ask them to indict the second most powerful Texan in Washington.
About four hours later, the new felony indictments were returned.
DeGuerin said he assumes Earle persuaded the third grand jury to act by telling them about the telephone poll of the grand jurors who had spent six months on the case.
"That's outrageous," DeGuerin said. "That's criminal."
It's no wonder that Ronnie hasn't had time for a press conference this week.
Except, of course, for the ones he allowed to be filmed for Matlock moment.
This is an OUTRAGE!
Well, at least DeLay can have the satisfaction of knowing that there was one Grand Jury that saw him as less criminaloid than a ham sandwich.
Unless you are a couple of filmmakers.
"Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret."
Oh, now they are secret. After he and his last jury forman have been blabbing all over town for weeks or months. BS.
Only conspiracy here is by Ronnie!!!
*This* is gonna go over big. >B-)
I wonder who the US Attorney for that part of Texas is, and whether there is a federal "hook" for grand-jury shopping.
Earle is a clown, all he needs to complete his "ensame'" is
a clown nose. The fact that this bozo can still occupy a
elected office is a testemony to the efficency to the TX
Dem practice of Gerrymandering. I pay no more attention to
this clown than I do to a little yapping schnauzer.
If it is true that there were film makers in the grand jury room (and Delay says it is) that alone should be enough to get the indictment quashed.
I wonder if the Texas State Attourney General can bring Earle up on conspiracy charges?
This just gets dumber and dumber. Man, I hope this gets press.
If I were able to convene multiple Grand Juries like this, I'd probably be able to get them to indict you for molesting your daugther (even if you don't have a daugther).
Very unusual for a grand jury to deny a request for an indictment. His case must really, really be flimsy.
The embattled Bush administration, weighed down by the lowest poll numbers of an incumbent president in recent political history, tried early this week to salvage some face by alleging that a prominent prosecutor was forced to rush to present new evidence to two grand juries in as many days because the Republican majority objected to a plea bargain that was merely rumored in the press to be offered by what was previously thought to be a state in thrall of their adopted native son.
...
It becomes clerarer, day by day, that if *anyone*
should be facing indictement, it the DemoScum Croney
Ronnie Earle, for Malfeasance.
river rat: Right On!!
Not secret enough for him to distance himself from a propagandista film crew documenting the show trials of Tom DeLay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.