Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor reveals third grand jury had refused DeLay indictment
Austin American-Statesman ^

Posted on 10/04/2005 10:43:26 PM PDT by j.frank.dobie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
It just gets curiouser and curiouser.

It's no wonder that Ronnie hasn't had time for a press conference this week.

1 posted on 10/04/2005 10:43:26 PM PDT by j.frank.dobie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
I just hope the news of earle's outrageous conduct in the delay affair makes as much news as the indictments themselves.
2 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:16 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
...In his statement, Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret...

Except, of course, for the ones he allowed to be filmed for Matlock moment.

3 posted on 10/04/2005 10:47:52 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
This sign allegedly is in the office of ronnie earle...when he goes off to work!


4 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:01 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

This is an OUTRAGE!


5 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:09 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle acknowledged that prosecutors presented their case to three grand juries — not just the two they had discussed — and one grand jury refused to indict DeLay.

Well, at least DeLay can have the satisfaction of knowing that there was one Grand Jury that saw him as less criminaloid than a ham sandwich.

6 posted on 10/04/2005 10:48:27 PM PDT by sourcery (Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret.

Unless you are a couple of filmmakers.

7 posted on 10/04/2005 10:54:34 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

"Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret."

Oh, now they are secret. After he and his last jury forman have been blabbing all over town for weeks or months. BS.


8 posted on 10/04/2005 10:56:30 PM PDT by KingKongCobra (Trying to save the "Donner Party" from themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

Only conspiracy here is by Ronnie!!!


9 posted on 10/04/2005 10:57:07 PM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
If DUELING were still legal, DeLay would have an appropriate means to reply to this ass-clown Prosecutor....

The legal right to challenge an offending asshole to a duel, must be restored...

The risk of serious consequences for being an ass-clown, would make for a more professional and polite society...

It would also have the effect of culling the assholes out of the gene pool.


Semper Fi
10 posted on 10/04/2005 10:57:33 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

*This* is gonna go over big. >B-)


11 posted on 10/04/2005 10:57:40 PM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

I wonder who the US Attorney for that part of Texas is, and whether there is a federal "hook" for grand-jury shopping.


12 posted on 10/04/2005 10:59:41 PM PDT by steveegg (The quarterly FReepathon is the price you pay for FR...until enough people become monthlies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra

Earle is a clown, all he needs to complete his "ensame'" is
a clown nose. The fact that this bozo can still occupy a
elected office is a testemony to the efficency to the TX
Dem practice of Gerrymandering. I pay no more attention to
this clown than I do to a little yapping schnauzer.


13 posted on 10/04/2005 11:00:48 PM PDT by p[adre29 (Arma in armatos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Except, of course, for the ones he allowed to be filmed for Matlock moment.

If it is true that there were film makers in the grand jury room (and Delay says it is) that alone should be enough to get the indictment quashed.

I wonder if the Texas State Attourney General can bring Earle up on conspiracy charges?

14 posted on 10/04/2005 11:06:26 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

This just gets dumber and dumber. Man, I hope this gets press.

If I were able to convene multiple Grand Juries like this, I'd probably be able to get them to indict you for molesting your daugther (even if you don't have a daugther).


15 posted on 10/04/2005 11:07:40 PM PDT by furquhart (Cheney-Bush '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

Very unusual for a grand jury to deny a request for an indictment. His case must really, really be flimsy.


16 posted on 10/04/2005 11:11:30 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smonk

The embattled Bush administration, weighed down by the lowest poll numbers of an incumbent president in recent political history, tried early this week to salvage some face by alleging that a prominent prosecutor was forced to rush to present new evidence to two grand juries in as many days because the Republican majority objected to a plea bargain that was merely rumored in the press to be offered by what was previously thought to be a state in thrall of their adopted native son.

...


17 posted on 10/04/2005 11:12:48 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie

It becomes clerarer, day by day, that if *anyone*
should be facing indictement, it the DemoScum Croney
Ronnie Earle, for Malfeasance.


18 posted on 10/04/2005 11:29:10 PM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

river rat: Right On!!


19 posted on 10/04/2005 11:35:05 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Even a fool is considered wise when he is silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: j.frank.dobie
In his statement, Earle said he would have no further comment because grand jury proceedings are secret.

Not secret enough for him to distance himself from a propagandista film crew documenting the show trials of Tom DeLay.

20 posted on 10/04/2005 11:42:05 PM PDT by weegee (The lesson from New Orleans? Smart Growth kills. You can't evacuate dense populations easily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson