Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Pat B summarizes conservative concerns quiete well here
1 posted on 10/04/2005 8:08:36 AM PDT by HonestConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: HonestConservative

It'll be fun to see the hearings. If she's not qualified, we'll find out.


2 posted on 10/04/2005 8:11:03 AM PDT by Huck ("If people are disappointed, they have every reason to be." Mark Levin on GW's latest lame move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
Where was Karl Rove in all of this? Is he so distracted by the Valerie Plame investigation he could not warn the president against what he would be doing to his reputation and coalition?

Yeah, sure.

3 posted on 10/04/2005 8:12:06 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

So cynical...the President said today...she was the best person he could find...and how can you doubt him? After all, she was the head of the Dallas Bar Association...I mean...with credentials like that....


4 posted on 10/04/2005 8:14:10 AM PDT by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
Well, if Pat still has relevancy on any topic it is the topic of recoiling from greatness. I used to respect him. But that was about 10 years ago...when he had potential to be something almost great...instead or irrelevant.
5 posted on 10/04/2005 8:14:36 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Last time I checked....W has won two Presidential election, Pat has a nice gig on PBS.

Hmmmmmmmm.


6 posted on 10/04/2005 8:16:31 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Sour Grapes!!!


7 posted on 10/04/2005 8:18:10 AM PDT by Virginia Queen (Virginia Queen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative; Admin Moderator

Posted yesterday with a different title:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1495924/posts


10 posted on 10/04/2005 8:20:31 AM PDT by RebelBanker (Captain's Log: Kinda nutty, a little corny, need to get my commode fixed now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Pat has become a Tool of the Media, and the Left who wish to regain power for the Dims. If he supported Bush on anything, they'd ignore him.

The only reason the Media gives him any attention is because he bashes Bush. "Let put on "Crazy Pat" to show the big divide in the Republican party!"

He would rather win his little battles and lose the war. Let him have his moments in the limelight.

Pat, I agree with you on illegal immigration and spending, but you can kiss my hillbilly butt.


13 posted on 10/04/2005 8:22:55 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Free Speech is a Right. Being Wrong is Just...Wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
You wrote, "Pat B summarizes conservative concerns quiete (sic) well here."

Buchanan doesn't speak for the conservative viewpoint. While talking head cable programs often include him as their idea of a conservative, he quit being conservative several years ago. When not railing against the Israeli lobby, the 'neo-con conspiracy', or the prosecution of ordinary, law-abiding former concentration camp guards, he takes potshots at the President--sour grapes, I think, because the POTUS ignores him, as do most mainstream Republicans.
15 posted on 10/04/2005 8:23:44 AM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Bush will be known as tough in war, weak kneed in all else.


16 posted on 10/04/2005 8:23:52 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Wow! A whole article from Pat without the mention of "Jews" in it!


18 posted on 10/04/2005 8:24:44 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
Deserves to be said again.

Reshaping the Supreme Court is an issue that unites Republicans and conservatives. And with his White House and party on the defensive for months over Cindy Sheehan and Katrina, Iraq and New Orleans, DeLay and Frist, gas prices and immigration, here was the great opportunity to draw all together for a battle of philosophies, by throwing the gauntlet down to the Left, sending up the name of a Luttig and declaring: "Go ahead and do your worst. We shall do our best."

20 posted on 10/04/2005 8:28:29 AM PDT by JesseJane (Stop the new tone already............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
her qualifications for the Supreme Court are nonexistent. She is not a brilliant jurist -- indeed, has never been a judge. She is not a scholar of the law

I think NOT being a judge is just fine. In fact, I think I'd prefer a nominiee who wasn't a lawyer either.

27 posted on 10/04/2005 8:37:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

He nailed it for once. Don't agree with him much, but....


30 posted on 10/04/2005 8:40:36 AM PDT by jdhljc169
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
By Pat Buchanan

Oh please the idea that Pat B knows greatness is absurd. Pat is a loser never was worshiped by other whiny loser never will bes. Actually WIN an election some day Pat and we MIGHT take you seriously.

31 posted on 10/04/2005 8:40:49 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
Bush-bot alert, they will be out in force defending their leader on this thread.

Not understanding that the terms "Republican" and "Conservative" are not synonymous.

"meep..meep... up yours, buchanan......meep...meep "

Noitce how good the stock market has been doing since the Miers announcement..meep...meep.

32 posted on 10/04/2005 8:41:08 AM PDT by gitmogrunt (tee-hee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
I am going to be snarky and say, I'm sure it does. Sigh.
34 posted on 10/04/2005 8:41:27 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

It's disheartening to watch conservatives eating their own.


35 posted on 10/04/2005 8:41:42 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative

Oh yeah, let's change the subject again when Buchanan speaks. It's all about how Buchanan is stooooopid! It's not about a mediocre SC nomination, no siree, let's dump on Buchanan. That's gotten tired and predictable ages ago. Yawn!


38 posted on 10/04/2005 8:43:51 AM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HonestConservative
She is not a scholar of the law.

That's who I'd really like to have on the Supreme Court, even if the nominee was a cave goblin.

39 posted on 10/04/2005 8:44:14 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson