Pat B summarizes conservative concerns quiete well here
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: HonestConservative
It'll be fun to see the hearings. If she's not qualified, we'll find out.
2 posted on
10/04/2005 8:11:03 AM PDT by
Huck
("If people are disappointed, they have every reason to be." Mark Levin on GW's latest lame move.)
To: HonestConservative
Where was Karl Rove in all of this? Is he so distracted by the Valerie Plame investigation he could not warn the president against what he would be doing to his reputation and coalition? Yeah, sure.
3 posted on
10/04/2005 8:12:06 AM PDT by
Rocko
To: HonestConservative
So cynical...the President said today...she was the best person he could find...and how can you doubt him? After all, she was the head of the Dallas Bar Association...I mean...with credentials like that....
4 posted on
10/04/2005 8:14:10 AM PDT by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: HonestConservative
Well, if Pat still has relevancy on any topic it is the topic of recoiling from greatness. I used to respect him. But that was about 10 years ago...when he had potential to be something almost great...instead or irrelevant.
5 posted on
10/04/2005 8:14:36 AM PDT by
Rokke
To: HonestConservative
Last time I checked....W has won two Presidential election, Pat has a nice gig on PBS.
Hmmmmmmmm.
6 posted on
10/04/2005 8:16:31 AM PDT by
Pondman88
To: HonestConservative
To: HonestConservative; Admin Moderator
10 posted on
10/04/2005 8:20:31 AM PDT by
RebelBanker
(Captain's Log: Kinda nutty, a little corny, need to get my commode fixed now.)
To: HonestConservative
Pat has become a Tool of the Media, and the Left who wish to regain power for the Dims. If he supported Bush on anything, they'd ignore him.
The only reason the Media gives him any attention is because he bashes Bush. "Let put on "Crazy Pat" to show the big divide in the Republican party!"
He would rather win his little battles and lose the war. Let him have his moments in the limelight.
Pat, I agree with you on illegal immigration and spending, but you can kiss my hillbilly butt.
13 posted on
10/04/2005 8:22:55 AM PDT by
rightinthemiddle
(Free Speech is a Right. Being Wrong is Just...Wrong.)
To: HonestConservative
You wrote, "Pat B summarizes conservative concerns quiete (sic) well here."
Buchanan doesn't speak for the conservative viewpoint. While talking head cable programs often include him as their idea of a conservative, he quit being conservative several years ago. When not railing against the Israeli lobby, the 'neo-con conspiracy', or the prosecution of ordinary, law-abiding former concentration camp guards, he takes potshots at the President--sour grapes, I think, because the POTUS ignores him, as do most mainstream Republicans.
To: HonestConservative
Bush will be known as tough in war, weak kneed in all else.
16 posted on
10/04/2005 8:23:52 AM PDT by
cynicom
To: HonestConservative
Wow! A whole article from Pat without the mention of "Jews" in it!
18 posted on
10/04/2005 8:24:44 AM PDT by
Bommer
To: HonestConservative
Deserves to be said again.
Reshaping the Supreme Court is an issue that unites Republicans and conservatives. And with his White House and party on the defensive for months over Cindy Sheehan and Katrina, Iraq and New Orleans, DeLay and Frist, gas prices and immigration, here was the great opportunity to draw all together for a battle of philosophies, by throwing the gauntlet down to the Left, sending up the name of a Luttig and declaring: "Go ahead and do your worst. We shall do our best."
20 posted on
10/04/2005 8:28:29 AM PDT by
JesseJane
(Stop the new tone already............)
To: HonestConservative
her qualifications for the Supreme Court are nonexistent. She is not a brilliant jurist -- indeed, has never been a judge. She is not a scholar of the lawI think NOT being a judge is just fine. In fact, I think I'd prefer a nominiee who wasn't a lawyer either.
27 posted on
10/04/2005 8:37:54 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: HonestConservative
He nailed it for once. Don't agree with him much, but....
To: HonestConservative
By Pat Buchanan
Oh please the idea that Pat B knows greatness is absurd. Pat is a loser never was worshiped by other whiny loser never will bes. Actually WIN an election some day Pat and we MIGHT take you seriously.
31 posted on
10/04/2005 8:40:49 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Don't get stuck on stupid now, reporters)
To: HonestConservative
Bush-bot alert, they will be out in force defending their leader on this thread.
Not understanding that the terms "Republican" and "Conservative" are not synonymous.
"meep..meep... up yours, buchanan......meep...meep "
Noitce how good the stock market has been doing since the Miers announcement..meep...meep.
32 posted on
10/04/2005 8:41:08 AM PDT by
gitmogrunt
(tee-hee)
To: HonestConservative
I am going to be snarky and say, I'm sure it does. Sigh.
To: HonestConservative
It's disheartening to watch conservatives eating their own.
35 posted on
10/04/2005 8:41:42 AM PDT by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: HonestConservative
Oh yeah, let's change the subject again when Buchanan speaks. It's all about how Buchanan is stooooopid! It's not about a mediocre SC nomination, no siree, let's dump on Buchanan. That's gotten tired and predictable ages ago. Yawn!
38 posted on
10/04/2005 8:43:51 AM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: HonestConservative
She is not a scholar of the law.That's who I'd really like to have on the Supreme Court, even if the nominee was a cave goblin.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson