More manure : )
Earle has a vendetta.
There is no there, here or there, but MSM are loving it.
Fox says this is a different grand jury with different charges based on the same facts. Hedging bets?
It looks like Ronnie Earle wanted to dominate the news cycle for two weeks, not just one. No other explanation for this action (not doing all indictments at the same time).
"The RNC then sent back like amounts to distribute to Texas candidates in 2002, the indictment alleges."
I hope there is not a "photocopied" document being used as evidence in this case. I have a strange feeling there is.
The AP just can't get the drool wiped off their mouths fast enough to get this tripe out...I wonder when Nazi Pelosi will be indicted for campaign fraud?? Why is it so quiet in California?? (as if we didn't know) --- oh, you mean every base in California is covered by a liberal!!!??? :-)
Got a phone call on the answering machine today urging to me condemn my Congressman for "accepting tainted money" from DeLay.
I would be interested in finding out how long the 1st Grand Jury reviewed the case, prior to coming down with an indictment. I would like to compare that to the 1 week it took for the 2nd Grand Jury to indict. (And taking into account the time it takes to give the newly seated Grand Jury their instructions, their oaths, etc. as Grand Jurors. A short 1 week seems pretty quick for something as convoluted as money laundering.
So this is what, the 8th Grand Jury to visit this?
Money laundering is taking illegally obtained money, and filter it through a legitimate business or organization.
The money from TRIMPAC was deposited into one account, but the check or checks for the candidates were written from a different account. We're talking about different money that wasn't mixed together.
IOW, the GJ is smokin' weed.
This has been a very stressful day. I can't even watch TV, or listen to talk radio.
THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT THE FIRST INDICTMENT AGAINST DELAY WAS BASED ON A LAW THAT DID NOT EXIST AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED NON CRIME!!!!!
Delay's lawyers said at the end of last week that the rumors were flying about Earle rushing to find a new grand jury.
The law that is listed in the first indictment....did not become effective until Sept of 2003. The money issues that Earle keeps screaming about (all legal even after 2003 mind you) happened in 2002.
So Earle rushed and got a laundering indictment.
WHICH MEANS HE KNOWS HIS CHARGES ARE ON THIN ICE.
THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT THE FIRST INDICTMENT AGAINST DELAY WAS BASED ON A LAW THAT DID NOT EXIST AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED NON CRIME!!!!!
Delay's lawyers said at the end of last week that the rumors were flying about Earle rushing to find a new grand jury.
The law that is listed in the first indictment....did not become effective until Sept of 2003. The money issues that Earle keeps screaming about (all legal even after 2003 mind you) happened in 2002.
So Earle rushed and got a laundering indictment.
WHICH MEANS HE KNOWS HIS CHARGES ARE ON THIN ICE.
The evil continues. At what point will the American people and a few others I won't mention realize that the left is out to destroy this country?
Looks like Earle went rushing for a new grand jury last week. He knew the first indictment would not hold up.
Here is the link to the story about the first indictment being based on a law that did not exist until 11 months after the 2002 elections.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1496006/posts?page=13
Where are the charges against the dims - who did exactly the same thing? I know, dumb question.