Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin; Petronski; beyond the sea; nopardons; Mo1; onyx

THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT THE FIRST INDICTMENT AGAINST DELAY WAS BASED ON A LAW THAT DID NOT EXIST AT THE TIME OF THE ALLEGED NON CRIME!!!!!

Delay's lawyers said at the end of last week that the rumors were flying about Earle rushing to find a new grand jury.

The law that is listed in the first indictment....did not become effective until Sept of 2003. The money issues that Earle keeps screaming about (all legal even after 2003 mind you) happened in 2002.

So Earle rushed and got a laundering indictment.

WHICH MEANS HE KNOWS HIS CHARGES ARE ON THIN ICE.


31 posted on 10/03/2005 4:11:04 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ArmyBratproud


Not even thin ice --- he knows that.

He's doing his damage now with the indictments.


33 posted on 10/03/2005 4:13:09 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyBratproud
The law that is listed in the first indictment....did not become effective until Sept of 2003. The money issues that Earle keeps screaming about (all legal even after 2003 mind you) happened in 2002.

The statutory conspiracy link didn't exist until 2003. The underlying laundering satute has been in place for more than a decade. See the April indictment for a rough idea of what today's indictment reads.

The fresh indictment has a huge silver lining.

36 posted on 10/03/2005 4:17:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson