Skip to comments.
New Biological Robots Build Themselves
SPACE.com ^
| September 28, 2005
| Ker Than
Posted on 10/03/2005 6:04:56 AM PDT by AntiGuv
Inspired by biological systems, scientists have developed miniature robots that can self-assemble using parts that float randomly in their environments. The robots also know when something is amiss and can correct their own mistakes.
Scientists have long been fascinated by how living cells are able to replicate DNA using building blocks floating randomly inside the cells nucleus. The interior of the nucleus is filled with a gel-like liquid known as nucleoplasm. The DNA building blocks, known as nucleotides, float around in this liquid like ingredients in a molecular soup. Also present in the nucleoplasm are proteins known as polymerases, which pluck nucleotides from the soup as needed when copying DNA.
The beauty of this approach is that the parts do not have to be presented in a specific order the way they are in a car assembly line. All the cell has to do is make sure there is a continuous supply of nucleotides and the polymerases do the rest. Furthermore, the more nucleotides present, the more likely they will come into contact with the polymerases and the faster the DNA strand can be assembled.
To artificially recreate this process, a research team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), headed by Joseph Jacobson, created robots capable of latching onto one another in specific sequences.
The robots come in two colors, yellow (Y) and green (G), and float around on a cushion of air like pucks on an air hockey table. Each robot is programmed to latch onto a green robot on one side and a yellow robot on the other to form 5-robot strings such as YGGYY or GYYGG.
The robots also have a built-in mechanism to correct any errors they might make. Each robot is able to check the color of its neighboring block and will unlatch itself if the sequence is not correct.
The study is detailed in the Sept. 29 issue of the journal Nature.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: robots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
10/03/2005 6:04:56 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
10/03/2005 6:05:29 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv; PatrickHenry

Been there done that!......
3
posted on
10/03/2005 6:07:22 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
To: AntiGuv
Grey goo is right. Chricton's book "Prey" is good but it could have been a lot better. It's worth reading if you want a brief explanation of how this technology can be created, and how it could run amok.
To: AntiGuv
To artificially recreate this process, a research team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), headed by Joseph Jacobson, created robots capable of latching onto one another in specific sequences. Figures its MIT. Those guys are bright. You really have to be Intelligent to Design something like this. I mean, it wouldn't just pop into existence through random acts in the laboratory, you know?
To: AntiGuv
i'm somehow reminded of the broom and the sorcerer's apprentice.
6
posted on
10/03/2005 6:11:56 AM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: ClearCase_guy
LoL! I can see where this thread is heading. I'm glad the guys at MIT made intelligent design a little easier for some people to grasp.
To: ClearCase_guy
Main Entry: sub·tle·ty
Pronunciation: 's&-t&l-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English sutilte, from Middle French sutilté, from Latin subtilitat-, subtilitas, from subtilis
1 : the quality or state of being subtle
2 : something subtle
8
posted on
10/03/2005 6:14:29 AM PDT
by
OSHA
(I've got a hole in my head too, but that's beside the point.)
To: AntiGuv
9
posted on
10/03/2005 6:15:24 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: AntiGuv
Another key component of Skynet.
10
posted on
10/03/2005 6:15:27 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(New Orleans rebuild by Mexican Labor will produce crawfish tacos and menuedo-gumbo.)
To: Rebelbase
11
posted on
10/03/2005 6:19:30 AM PDT
by
GreenLanternCorps
(4-0 The September Jinx is broken!!! Who Dey! Who Dey! Who Dey Think Gonna Beat Dem Bengals!!!)
To: AntiGuv
If you read this closely you will see that there is nothing in common with what is known as "Grey Goo". All they have done is develop nano-machines that can create other nano-machines out of other nano-machines. The theory behind "Grey Goo" is that a machine can create a replica of itself by using raw materials available in the environment. That is not what happened at MIT.
12
posted on
10/03/2005 6:19:33 AM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: Rebelbase
We need to be sure that the Calif Governor cannot become president. He has ties to skynet.
To: Sthitch
I know, but it's a step along the way!
14
posted on
10/03/2005 6:32:49 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
When can I get one that can do the housework? (Oh yes, and fetch me a beer.)
15
posted on
10/03/2005 6:51:19 AM PDT
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(The liberals promised to move to Canada but they lied . . . bwaaaaah.)
To: AntiGuv
No, not really. This has little or nothing to do with true replication. This is simply self assembly. The individual devices need to have the components manufactured for them before they can assemble. Last year I read a well done article that debunks the whole "Grey Goo" theory, if I can find the link again I will reply with it.
16
posted on
10/03/2005 7:10:17 AM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: Sthitch
Please do if you find it; I'd be very interested to read it.
17
posted on
10/03/2005 7:11:25 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
OK, here it is:
Link It is short, but very informative.
18
posted on
10/03/2005 7:32:43 AM PDT
by
Sthitch
To: AntiGuv
>grey goo!
To: ClearCase_guy
I mean, it wouldn't just pop into existence through random acts in the laboratory, you know?
Gee, why not? Statistically speaking... oh wait. It's only living things that it happens to. Non living things don't just happen in nature. Riiiiight.
20
posted on
10/03/2005 9:12:54 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson