Oh, come one, you're behaving like the MSM. Lies by omission.
As I'm sure you're aware, her last donation to any democrat was in 1987, following which she has consistently donated to Republicans.
She has apparently grown in the nearly 20 years since her donation to any democrat.
How many times have I heard complaints about SC justices who do their "growing" after being appointed to the court? She's gotten hers out of the way, and the "growth" has been in the right direction.
One should attempt to understand that "law firm" pressure to donate to both parties can be a career decision..
Sometimes an ex-Democrat is similar to an ex-smoker - they become intolerant of their old ways (like me) :)
It's bothered me that people who say that the justices are growing act like the growing is a positive thing.
I think it's more like the justices are picking up the bad habits of the more liberal justices. Like teenagers more easily get persuaded to drink or smoke if they hang around with the wrong crowd.