"This nomination is a betrayal to conservatives."
In order to make that statement you must know alot about her. She is the lead person vetting the president's nominees. Don't you think that person would represent the conservative viewpoint? Your view suggests she shouldn't even be in the vetting process. You trust her so little how could you allow her in the vetting process? So now in order to be consistent you most protest her total involvement.
believe me EVERYONE here knows EVERYTHING about her except you and me. This should be obvious, given the wealth of information available about her..(sarcasm) If only we could find a pill that would instantly remove ego, then all would be good..
I have praised her administrative abilities, and wonder why the chief executive would relinquish a capable person. Her qualifications as a jurist are what I question. Since she has been nominated to be a Supreme Court justice, I would expect some judicial experience. Considering the highly qualified, and experienced pool of women and men available. And I am pretty familiar with her record.