I have praised her administrative abilities, and wonder why the chief executive would relinquish a capable person. Her qualifications as a jurist are what I question. Since she has been nominated to be a Supreme Court justice, I would expect some judicial experience. Considering the highly qualified, and experienced pool of women and men available. And I am pretty familiar with her record.
Did Renquist have judicial experience?
Her role is more than administrative. I've already heard she had much to say on measuring judicial philosophy of each candidate.