Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
Gives you a pretty good idea of which side they're on.........

I am on the conservative side. This pick is not conservative, by any measure of actions. Words out of the chief executives mouth do NOT make this sorry, leftist, liberal conservative. And the Rah-Rah crowd continues to think there is some strategy to selecting a SC justice based SOLELY on gender. Fill the quota, and screw the conservative base.

1,953 posted on 10/03/2005 9:32:00 AM PDT by ARealMothersSonForever (The Land o' Gar (yes I have a gunrack in my truck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1921 | View Replies ]


To: ARealMothersSonForever
This pick is not conservative, by any measure of actions

Please, then, tell us how this is not a conservative pick, given what we know at this point.

1,955 posted on 10/03/2005 9:32:51 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Words out of the chief executives mouth do NOT make this sorry, leftist, liberal conservative.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Why not do some research instead of slandering her?

1,971 posted on 10/03/2005 9:34:57 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ("I'm quitting the GOP! (Again!)" - Eeyore. Join the Self-Annointed Martyr Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Please explain how you KNOW that this is not a conservative choice, or that it was based 'solely' on gender?

(Give facts please......educate the 'rahrah' crowd who is researching facts and finding out just who this woman really is, before echoing DNC talking points or having a hissy fit.......please).

1,976 posted on 10/03/2005 9:36:41 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

"And the Rah-Rah crowd continues to think there is some strategy to selecting a SC justice based SOLELY on gender. Fill the quota, and screw the conservative base."

I guess I must be part of the "Rah-Rah" crowd.

I'm a woman, and I don't give a rip whether the President nominates a woman or a minority. I want him to nominate the best person for the job, and if that person happened to be another white male, that would be perfectly fine with me. There is nothing in the Constitution that says the SC has to have a particular makeup or distribution.

At this point, based on Bush's previous judicial nominations, I choose to trust what he has done here and see how this plays out.


2,736 posted on 10/03/2005 5:47:39 PM PDT by Purrcival (Let's give Miers a chance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1953 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson