Posted on 10/01/2005 7:17:51 AM PDT by syriacus
A controversial study linking a reduction in crime during the 1990s with legalized abortion two decades earlier has been published in one of the nation's foremost scholarly journals.
The study, entitled The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime, was published in the May 7 edition of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which is edited by the Economics Department of Harvard University and calls itself "the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language."
Authored by researchers John J. Donohue III and Steven D. Levitt, the study had been privately circulated since 1999, but had not been accepted for publication in a scholarly journal until now.
An abstract of the study, published in November 2000 by the National Bureau of Economic Research, states, "legalized abortion appears to account for as much as 50 percent of the recent drop in crime," during the 1990s.
The study also suggests that abortion particularly among young black women results in a significant decrease in crime.
"Fertility declines for black women are three times greater than for whites," stated the study. "Given that homicide rates of black youths are roughly nine times higher than those of white youths, racial differences in the fertility effects of abortion are likely to translate into greater homicide reductions."
Donohue and Levitt state that their study is not an attempt to promote abortion, which opposed by about as many people who support it.
"In attempting to identify a link between legalized abortion and crime, we do not mean to suggest that such a link is 'good' or 'just,' but rather, merely show that such a relationship exists," the researchers note.
In conducting their study, Donohue and Levvitt, researchers at Stanford Law School and the University of Chicago, respectively, the two said their data show that the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide was followed by a significant drop in crime during the 1990s.
"Abrupt legal developments... might plausibly have a similarly abrupt influence 15-20 years later when the cohorts born in the wake of liberalized abortion would start reaching their high-crime years," the study states.
The analysis included four primary factors: race, teenage motherhood, unmarried motherhood and whether the conceived child was indeed wanted.
Pro-life groups and some African-American organizations denounced the study when it first became public in August 1999, referring to it in terms of "prenatal racial profiling" and "eugenics," which deals with controlled human mating.
The group Project 21 said two years ago that "widespread acceptance of the conclusions of studies like "Legalized Abortion and Crime" could be used to resurrect... Margaret Sanger's racist "Negro Project" of the 1930s," which was an effort to reduce the size of black families.
But since it's emergence in 1999, the study has been steadily accepted in the academic community and is now listed among the requirements of numerous university courses and in a growing number of university libraries.
The William M. Rains Library at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles listed the study in its February 2001 Accessions List, and a Fall, 2000 economics course at Harvard University listed the study as part of the course's reading requirements.
The research by Donohue and Levitt is also among the scholarly readings available at the Georgetown University Law Center and the report is listed among the readings for courses in Labor, Economics, Public Policy and Human Capital at the University of California-Los Angeles.
© 2001 CNSNews.com © 2001 Maranatha Christian News Service
(Post date: May 16, 2001)
BUMP!
I remember one study that showed that putting criminals in jail, not on the street, lowered the crime rate, that study was trashed and ignored.
Unfortunately Bennett opened the door for his enemies to jump in.
It is like quoting an article that says "If you shot all illegal aliens on site, it would reduce border crossings and crime in general".
Whether the statement is true or not is secondary to the position it puts you in to make it in public.
Bennett's mistake was mentioning race. Abortion is OK.
Granted, Bennett might've been a bit insensitive in his comments . . . BUT NOT IF ALL OF THEM ARE READ OR LISTENED TO SO YOU GET HIS COMMENTS IN CONTEXT! The problem is the Libbers don't care about the truth. They bash us mercifully for any "perceived" slight . . . then keep reelecting murderers and traitors.
By the way . . . YOU'VE GOT A GREAT HOMEPAGE!!
I've wondered when the left will start parsing some of Rush Limbaugh's soundbites where he says sarcastically things like "I'm a racist-sexist-bigoted-homophobe" (in the eyes of the left...).
45 million dead. The left does not have a problem with that.
Nah, they'd have nailed him anyway.
guess you missed the part about black homicide rate 9X that of whites...
I'm dissappointed in the responses here. You guys seem to make the assumption that we are all criminals. Let me educate. There are two types of black people. People like myself who have jobs, pay taxes, and support our government...then you have the other types who blame "the man" and commit crimes and so forth. I'm just saying don't lump us all together like that. That's what Bennet did. And he was wrong. Period. End of disscussion. The fact that so many people here are defending his comments is sad.
By the way if you think i'm some sort of liberal troll....check my posts. I'm basically a young Clarence Thomas in my conservatism...lol
Get over it. Tell your people to get with it like you did. If he had said whites instead of blacks there would have been nonsense replies like we are hearing now.
I agree. But now that the horse is out of the barn, let's look at the damage the pro-aborts are doing by saying that it's good to abort babies, because crime goes down.
Thanks, geedee.
Interesting.
They are looking to distract from Saddam's upcoming trial.
I am truly sorry, if you think I am thinking that way.
Perhaps you are reading my mind incorrectly.
Sorry, just because you're a black conservative doesn't mean we're going to be PC on sensitive issues.
The facts are what they are. Only those on the Left are trying to turn it into a racist issue, not conservatives.
I don't think people are arriving at that conclusion you allege. The crime rate among blacks is "9 times" that what it is among whites/the general population and that's significant. No one alleges that "all blacks" are involved in those criminal statistics but the statistics do indicate a big problem among the black race. As to the whys and why nots, I don't know.
And before anyone introduces the issue of "poverty" among blacks as being motivator for the far higher crime rate among blacks, the reality about poverty is that more whites live in poverty, proportionately, than do other races in the U.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.