Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Pennsylvania] Gov. Rendell backs evolution
York Daily Record [Penna] ^ | 30 September 2005 | NICOLE FREHSEE

Posted on 09/30/2005 7:45:00 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

The Campaign to Defend the Constitution, a group organized to promote the teaching of evolution, sent letters Thursday to all 50 governors, urging them to ensure that science classes teach material based on established science.

The letters were signed by more than 100 scientists and clergy of various faiths, the group said.

Although Gov. Ed Rendell had not received the letters as of Thursday afternoon, spokeswoman Kate Philips said he is committed to the idea of teaching evolution in science classes.

Rendell "believes that (intelligent design) is more than appropriate to be taught in religion classes, but has no room in science classes in public schools," Philips said. "But this is in the court's hands now, and other than his opinion, he has no influence."

But a spokeswoman for DefCon, the group's nickname for itself, said the group hopes that after governors receive the letter, they will make a public announcement opposing the teaching of intelligent design.

"It would be nice if (Rendell) took a stance and said, whether it's in the Dover district or any other Pennsylvania district, 'We need to protect the teaching of science in our science classrooms,'" Jessica Smith said.

The group named Dover its top "Island of Ignorance" in the country. It has targeted areas in the country where it says evolution is being challenged at the state level or in public school science classrooms. They include Cobb County, Ga.; Kansas; Blount County, Tenn.; Ohio; Grantsburg, Wisc.; Alabama; Utah; South Carolina; and Florida.

Advocates of intelligent design say life is so complex that it is likely the result of deliberate design by some unidentified creator, not random evolutionary mutation and adaptation.

Critics say it is essentially creationism and violates the separation of church and state when it becomes part of a public school curriculum.

"We can do better when we let science do its job, and ask religion to do its job," former ACLU executive director Ira Glasser said Thursday, "and if there's a need for conversation, please, let's not do it in the classrooms of our children."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: crevolist; dover; evolution; oviraptor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last
To: keithtoo

Oh please, trotting that out is just silly.

I think you actually do know what that line means, but you disingenuously use it in connection with the KKK for purely emotional reasons. Do you feeeeeeel better now?



21 posted on 09/30/2005 8:05:17 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
You know the rule:


22 posted on 09/30/2005 8:05:31 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC

And those who believe in evolution want to put out the flame of God, so I suppose it's only fair.


23 posted on 09/30/2005 8:06:01 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Drool! Drool!
24 posted on 09/30/2005 8:06:14 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"You can still make me laugh."

It's my goal in life.


25 posted on 09/30/2005 8:06:19 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

How come the Democrats always come up with the good names? THE CAMPAIGN TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION, People for the American Way, etc. You can be certain whatever the name is, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with what the group is promoting, but it sure is soothing to the sheeple. Why don't the Republicans have a good PR firm?


26 posted on 09/30/2005 8:07:27 AM PDT by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo

"Hmmmm....wonder what his non KKK constituents think of this."




Well...isn't that clever. Go find a British dictionary circa 1859 and look up the word "race." Then get back to us, OK?


27 posted on 09/30/2005 8:07:44 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo

I'm sure you of course realize that favoured races in this context has absolutely nothing to do with races of humans. This means the Dodo bird was not a favored race (species) of bird. Being that all humans no matter their race can interbreed it is not the same thing. Nice try though.


28 posted on 09/30/2005 8:07:52 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
It's very amusing...watching the evolutionists running about screeching like scalded cats because someone dares to introduce (gasp) different ideas...

Sorry to tell you, but merely introducing "different ideas" isn't enough in Science. For example, you no longer here about the theory of aether, the "planetary model" of the atom is no longer taught either. Medical students no longer study the "humors", and "bleeding" patients, except rare instances, is no longer practiced. There are a whole host of "different" ideas that are not recognized by science, thats just how it is. It takes more than being different.

29 posted on 09/30/2005 8:08:28 AM PDT by Paradox (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

"Being that all humans no matter their race can interbreed it is not the same thing."

Ah, but that's a recent evolutionary change. Up until the middle of the last century, it was impossible for members of different races to interbreed in several states in this country.

More proof of evolution...


30 posted on 09/30/2005 8:09:51 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

And soon we won't hear about evolution!


31 posted on 09/30/2005 8:10:14 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

God isn't a flame, it has been used throughout history to keep people in the dark. Better not to look through the telescope at all then to look through it and find religious presuppositions challenged.


32 posted on 09/30/2005 8:11:51 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
And soon we won't hear about evolution!

At least you're honest about your intentions.

33 posted on 09/30/2005 8:12:02 AM PDT by Paradox (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

Medical students no longer study the "humors"




Well, that's not exactly true. What about the effect of planting a cadaver body part in a fellow student's bed. That's pretty humorous, if you ask me.

Oh...wait...I get it.


34 posted on 09/30/2005 8:12:11 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC

I have often looked through telescopes and still believe in God. Amazing, huh?


35 posted on 09/30/2005 8:12:57 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Good for Governor Rendell!


36 posted on 09/30/2005 8:13:34 AM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Oh, you are right, and I forgot about this:


37 posted on 09/30/2005 8:13:43 AM PDT by Paradox (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"And soon we won't hear about evolution!"

Well, based on the posts of some of the creationists and ID proponents here, lots of people haven't really heard about evolution already. More's the pity.


38 posted on 09/30/2005 8:13:49 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

So what if intelligent design isn't science. That doesn't detract from reasoning out where matter and life came from. Science is self-limiting to its own capability. Intelligent design has a much wider reach.


39 posted on 09/30/2005 8:13:53 AM PDT by ex-snook (Vote gridlock for the most conservative government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


40 posted on 09/30/2005 8:13:58 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-449 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson