Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin on DeLay
National Review Online ^ | 9/28/05 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 09/28/2005 11:07:04 AM PDT by wcdukenfield

DELAY [Mark R. Levin] Here's my first take on this indictment (I've only read the indictment and nothing more for now): The indictment is three pages in length. Other than a statement that "one or more" of 3 individuals, including Tom DeLay, entered into an illegal conspiracy, I can't find a single sentence tying Tom DeLay to a crime. That is, there's not a single sentence tying DeLay to the contribution. The indictment describes the alleged conduct of two other individuals, but nothing about DeLay. You would think if Ronnie Earle had even a thin reed of testimony linking DeLay to the contribution, it would have been noted in the indictment to justify the grand jury's action. Moreover, not only is there no information about DeLay committing acts in furtherance of a conspiracy, there's no information about DeLay entering into a conspiracy. I honestly believe that unless there's more, this is an egregious abuse of prosecutorial power. It's a disgrace. I understand that not everything has to be contained in an indictment, but how about something! Posted at 01:58 PM


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; bogus; colyandro; delay; democratslander; earle; ellis; levin; marklevin; prosecutorialfraud; ronnieearle; sciploy; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-330 next last
To: misterrob
"But, I see too many people here circling the wagons around a guy that has not represented the interests of conservative thinking and that is, limited government."

It's not about whether he's doing what you think is best, it's about whether or not he's guilty. I note by your third party usage of "republican" that you may not, in fact, be a member of the Republican party?

121 posted on 09/28/2005 12:03:04 PM PDT by cake_crumb (very WRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield

The Democrats and their allies in the mainstream media have been on the prod for DeLay since I can remember. Remember how they reacted when he had the courage to stand with the NRA in public? Other Republican politicians don't have the guts to do that. Hopefully this indictment will be shown for what it is, a political assassination attempt.

BTW, over on MSNBC their talking heads were beside themselves with joy over this news. You would have thought they had hit the jackpot at Vegas.


122 posted on 09/28/2005 12:03:40 PM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Oh! You're talking about the Arkansas printing!


123 posted on 09/28/2005 12:03:52 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
The indictment is as bogus as a $3 bill.

Speaking of $3 Bills, Delay's district is getting $1.6 million dollars in pork barrel money this year. (That's 533,333 $3 bills.) I have no use for the guy and I hope his next job is working as the janitor at the Austin YMCA.

124 posted on 09/28/2005 12:05:34 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Oh, and don't forget about the 99 cent bill:


125 posted on 09/28/2005 12:06:54 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Many Democrats are not weak Americans. But nearly all weak Americans are Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Thanks, Hillary. Good luck with your reelection campaign.


126 posted on 09/28/2005 12:07:14 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
Speaking of $3 Bills, Delay's district is getting $1.6 million dollars in pork barrel money this year. (That's 533,333 $3 bills.) I have no use for the guy and I hope his next job is working as the janitor at the Austin YMCA.

It doesn't matter what you think, it's up to the voters in his district.

127 posted on 09/28/2005 12:07:42 PM PDT by dfwgator (Flower Mound, TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe

Sorry, I haven't found the entire transcript, just his statement.


128 posted on 09/28/2005 12:08:03 PM PDT by maggief (No 'luffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
ITS THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGE
129 posted on 09/28/2005 12:09:28 PM PDT by nairBResal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield

Those of us who have been following this saw this coming for months. Standard M.O. by yet another corrupt Democrat.


130 posted on 09/28/2005 12:09:46 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Aren't the "reality-based community" folks the same ones who insist there is no objective reality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield
Why don't they just get rid of DeLay the good, old-fashioned legal way -- condemn his neighborhood and give it to developers under eminent domain and make him move to another district if he wants to run again, since they'll be taking his residency away.

-PJ

131 posted on 09/28/2005 12:11:21 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield; All

The indictment is totally about the 2006 elections, and the pace of the prosecution will be handled so as to make sure that it will not be completed before those elections, if the Democrtatic prosecutor cannot convict Delay.


132 posted on 09/28/2005 12:11:31 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

When, and When Delay gets this charge thrown out of court he should file a civil lawsuit for malicious prosecution, and a formal complaint with the Texas Supreme court to have Ronnie Earle's law license revoked.

I'm tired of seeing 'RAT prosecutors abusing their positions for political purposes. (see Ruch Limbaugh v Palm Beach DA)

I would just love to see a 'Pub fight like hell for something.


133 posted on 09/28/2005 12:12:23 PM PDT by boilerfan (Hoosier born and Boilermaker educated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield

Earle is an old time southern Democrat who is scared and demoralized as he witnesses Texas and the rest of the south reject the once powerful Donkey Party.

As as result, Earle is blindly and blatantly lashing out as someone in their dying moments often does.


134 posted on 09/28/2005 12:14:35 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boilerfan
I just read the indictment. Delay is named at the end, almost as an afterthought, of being guilty of having "waived application of articles 12.01 and 12.03 of the Texas code of crimninal procedure to the indictment presented herein."

Yes, it's bogus.

135 posted on 09/28/2005 12:16:59 PM PDT by cake_crumb (very WRONG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I consider my commute home to be an extension of my formal education. Mark is one of the smartest and most informative hosts on the radio. He really should be coast to coast.


136 posted on 09/28/2005 12:17:00 PM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graycliff

Made me laugh out loud--thank you.


137 posted on 09/28/2005 12:17:33 PM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron--the story of America through an ordinary family. ISBN: 1-4137-5397-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

You're awesome! Thanks so much.


138 posted on 09/28/2005 12:17:43 PM PDT by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: wcdukenfield

The left don't need no stinkin facts.


139 posted on 09/28/2005 12:23:04 PM PDT by OldFriend (One Man With Courage Makes a Majority ~ Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boilerfan
I agree and I hope he's exonerated. But I still don't like anyone who spends my hard earned money on PORK. Good Riddance!!!
140 posted on 09/28/2005 12:23:10 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-330 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson