Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Indicted, Steps Down(Could get up to two years if convicted.)
Austin American Statesman ^ | September 28, 2005 | Laylan Copelin

Posted on 09/28/2005 10:52:59 AM PDT by kellynla

A Travis County grand jury today indicted U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay on one count of criminal conspiracy, prompting the Sugar Land Republican to give up his leadership post in Congress.

"I have notified (House Speaker Dennis Hastert) that I will temporarily step aside from my position as majority leader pursuant to rules of the House Republican Conference and the actions of the Travis County District Attorney today," DeLay said in a statement.

The charge, a state jail felony punishable by up to two years incarceration, stems from his role with his political committee, Texans for a Republican Majority, a now-defunct organization that already had been indicted on charges of illegally using corporate money during the 2002 legislative elections.

The grand jury, however, took no action against Texas House Speaker Tom Craddick, Texas Association of Business President Bill Hammond or state Reps. Dianne Delisi and Beverly Woolley, both of whom sit on the political committee's board, for their roles in the election.

The grand jury's term ended today.

Delay's defense team will hold a news conference in Austin later this afternoon. The team includes defense attorneys Bill White and Steve Brittain of Austin and Dick DeGuerin of Houston.

"It's a skunky indictment. It stinks to high heaven," White said.

DeLay and his associates insisted the corporate money was legally spent on committee overhead or issue advertising and not campaign-related activity.

An indictment does not force DeLay to resign as a member of Congress, but the GOP's rules demand that he resign his post as majority leader as he fights the charges. Congressional Republicans earlier tried to drop that requirement, citing Earle's investigation as a political vendetta, but they ultimately maintained the rule after withering criticism.

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: delay; ronnieearle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: altura
The DA did not hand down the indictment, the Grand Jury did. DO YOU KNOW THE FACTS??? I seriously doubt it.
21 posted on 09/28/2005 11:04:47 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (All democrats are ENEMIES of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

As a former Texan (please Texans help me out here), I know that Ronnie Earle, the dim DA in liberal Travis County - been there for 18-20 years I believe - has traditionally used his office to file spurious charges against pub pols - mostly they end up amounting to nothing. Just fishing, trying to make trouble etc.

As the DA of the county that contains the state capital, Earle has way too much power and he abuses it.


22 posted on 09/28/2005 11:05:27 AM PDT by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Me too.

In this case, we probably shouldn't take any chances, so let's just string him up and then we'll wait and see if he really did it....



/sarc?


23 posted on 09/28/2005 11:05:54 AM PDT by rockrr (Never argue with a man who buys ammo in bulk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Hopefully this will be trial by jury,not trial by msm.
If he is guilty, he should do the time. If he is innocent, the media should lay off.


24 posted on 09/28/2005 11:06:02 AM PDT by Straight8 (Today is a gift, that's why it's called "the present".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
And Travis County is the most liberal area in all of Texas. Earl could indict a "ham sandwich" using an Travis County grand jury as long as the sandwich was a Republican.
25 posted on 09/28/2005 11:06:31 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

That's not brutally honest - just sensible. I don't think anyone would argue with your statement.


26 posted on 09/28/2005 11:07:04 AM PDT by broadway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
And the same old Freepers will run for the hills! LOL, they complain and lecture the GOP?
27 posted on 09/28/2005 11:08:05 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Kay Bailey Hutchison was indicted by the same prosecutor in 1993 on criminal ethics charges, which she said were politically-motivated by Democrats. She was acquitted in February 1994 when Earle's state prosecutors, disheartened by the judge's pre-trial rulings, refused to present their case.

Air tight case has no air.
28 posted on 09/28/2005 11:08:08 AM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

I meant RA. Apologies.


29 posted on 09/28/2005 11:08:41 AM PDT by broadway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
I completely agree with that statement RA.

If he's guilty, go to jail. If the person who indicted had no legitimate, credible evidence, he should be held to answer and face charges.

30 posted on 09/28/2005 11:09:26 AM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

...let the chips fall where they may and we'll learn the truth. I suspect this is going to be a Raymond "Can You Tell Me Where to Pick Up My Reputation" Donovan witch hunt by a RAT prosecutor...I've always wondered how RATs escape the political process?


31 posted on 09/28/2005 11:09:36 AM PDT by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight8

Like DeLay said about Kay Bailey Hutchison, the charges may be dropped...
After all, you can "indict" a ham sandwich! LOL


32 posted on 09/28/2005 11:09:53 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Appears the TX Chicken RATS been waiting for this since 2001 when they ran for cover because they didn't want a quorum in the state legislature to plan redistricting, and they blamed their problems on DeLay then.


33 posted on 09/28/2005 11:10:00 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Payback is painful. DeLay almost singlehandedly locked in the Republican majority in Congess by his redistricting effort in Texas. This is sour grapes for the Dems. More chicken-sh*tted stuff rather competing on the issues.

DeLay is a strongwilled, go for the jugular Republican not a weak-kneed appologetic Republican. That makes him a target.

Drier is a better face for the Republicans anyway. He'll win more votes.


34 posted on 09/28/2005 11:10:22 AM PDT by playball0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon
If the article said

"Hillary and her associates insisted the corporate money was legally spent on committee overhead or issue advertising and not campaign-related activity."

who here would say it was anything but legal parsing of words and distortion?

35 posted on 09/28/2005 11:11:07 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Why don't you wait until the trial before you throw him to the wolves. It's incredibly easy to get a Grand Jury indictment. Look at Earle's success (none) in these partisan witch hunts and then tell me you believe DeLay will be convicted. I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts he'll be acquitted. Meantime the MSM will have a field day with this.


36 posted on 09/28/2005 11:11:08 AM PDT by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Luke Skyfreeper
Democrat Senator Bobby Torricelli had more problems in his basket than Delay. Cash, Rolex, antiques, custom suits, jewelry for girlfriend and Mercedes and probably more. Ethics problems? Nah. Illegal? Nah. Two fundraisers went to jail but not little Bobby. There was more but everyone is expected to shutup about it. How about candidate Corizine giving a bunch of money to a female NJ union leader?

Here is to Danny Rostenkowski, Jimmy Traficant and Congressman G.Studds of Cape Cod.

37 posted on 09/28/2005 11:11:35 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Your point is well-taken, but I hold to a classical definition of Law formulated by Thomas Aquinas: "an ordinance of reason for the common good, promulgated by him who has the care of the community."

Only in as much as a law truly reflects the common good and is promulgated by a just authority is it truly a law, that is, morally binding. Martin Luther King, Jr quoted this definition of law. Just because it is a law on the books does not mean that it is just. Hence, simply because it is on the books does not mean that it should be obeyed. Only in as much as a human law comports with natural law, it is just.

Now, I do not know the nature of this law. I tend to dislike campaign finance law all-together, unless it simply restricts money coming in from out of the state in the case of state elections.

My main point is to clarify that a law that genuinely promotes the common good is morally obliging whereas one that does not promote the common good is not morally obliging and is only called a law because it resembles law superficially.


38 posted on 09/28/2005 11:12:21 AM PDT by SaintThomasMorePrayForUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

I'm more confident since he stepped down.
He doesn't appear to be hiding, and he isn't putting himself before the party.
Unlike numerous other politicians time won't allow me to name...


39 posted on 09/28/2005 11:12:45 AM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: playball0
Drier is a better face for the Republicans anyway.

Oh yes, David Drier is a great conservative...

Sheesh, do I need to say ((sarcasm))??

40 posted on 09/28/2005 11:13:08 AM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson