Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lynndie England sentenced to 3 years in prison
tvnz.com.nz/ reuters ^ | Sept 27, 2005 | reuters

Posted on 09/27/2005 6:27:09 PM PDT by prairiebreeze

Lynndie England, the US soldier pictured holding a leash to a naked Iraqi inmate at Abu Ghraib prison in a scandal that prompted global outrage, was sentenced on Tuesday to three years in prison and given a dishonorable discharge.

In sentencing testimony just hours before, England, who had faced a maximum nine years behind bars, apologised for her actions and said she remained an American patriot.

"After the photos were released, I've heard that attacks were made on US armed forces because of them," she said.

"I apologise to coalition forces and all the families," England, speaking slowly, told the jury of five officers, also apologising to "detainees, the families, America and all the soldiers."

England, 22, was convicted on Monday of abuse such as being photographed pointing to the genitals of a naked Iraqi prisoner in a section of the prison were the administrative clerk did not have any official duties.

The former West Virginia chicken factory worker blamed her involvement on Charles Graner, the abuse ringleader and father of her child.

"I was embarrassed because I was used by Private Graner; I didn't realise it at the time," she said, sometimes pausing at length to gather her thoughts. "I trusted him and I loved him."

England's mother showed up briefly with the 11-month-old baby in the military courtroom for the first time, and the Army reservist talked at length about how the child, who bears a striking resemblance to Graner, had changed her life.

Remember the baby

As the jury began its deliberations on the punishment on Tuesday evening, England telephoned her mother to ask her to return to the courthouse with the baby for their last time together before her sentencing.

England's testimony and appearance by the baby was a clear last effort to humanise a woman whose face is known worldwide but who has said little in public. Her lawyer, Capt. Jonathan Crisp, asked the jury to remember the baby and not sentence England to prison.

"Let her go home, send her home," Crisp said. "She will probably in all likelihood be facing this stigma for the rest of her life."

The prosecution asked the jury for a sentence of four to six years. "I cannot think of another incident that has more tarnished the image of the US Army," Capt. Chris Graveline said. "Who can think of a person who has disgraced the United States Army more?"

England was found guilty on six counts on Monday. All include the language of "wrongfully posing for a photograph."

The publication of these images early in 2004 caused major damage to America's image.

Asked by one of her lawyers about a photo of her baby with an American flag, England replied, "I'm still patriotic, ma'am, very much."

Graner admits abuse

By contrast, Graner, who is serving a 10-year sentence for abuses at the prison outside Baghdad, did not show any repentance earlier in the day and said he was acting on behalf of US military intelligence.

"Sir, I nearly beat a military intelligence detainee to death with military intelligence there," Graner, 37, told the court. "We treated each military detainee specifically on how the handler wanted."

Defense lawyers have sought to show that England was overly compliant to authority and Graner in particular. About England, Graner said, "She's young, she's suggestible."

England said Graner swept her off her feet.

"He was very charming, funny and, at the time, it looked like he was interested in the same things I was," she said. "I trusted him to help me out, to lead me to the right things."

The prosecution had agreed to a plea deal in May in which England would serve no more than 30 months in confinement. The judge negated the deal after hearing testimony from Graner that suggested England may not have been guilty.

England's case was the latest prosecution or plea bargain of low-level soldiers who served at Abu Ghraib.

The military has also reprimanded a small number of higher-ranking officers but none has faced criminal charges.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abughraib; courtmartial; lynndieengland; panties; prison; shame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: operation clinton cleanup

Only Bill and Lyndie can say that.


41 posted on 09/27/2005 7:06:50 PM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F

I haven't been following this story much - glad to hear that the US military has stuck to the UCMJ and not fallen into the pits of PC justice that civilians have to put up with.

Unfortunately though, officers are usually treated more leniently - like white collar criminals - "the embarrassment is punishment enough" is the usual excuse for light sentences.

I was always of the feeling that the punishment for the leaders should be equal to the TOTAL punishment for all those under their command. If 10 enlisted get 1 year each, the CO deserves no less than 10 years!

Same goes for police, lawyers, judges, and definitely politicians - the death penalty should be mnadatory for the acts of treason by those people. Since they have the power of life and death over the public - they need to suffer the maximum consequences.


42 posted on 09/27/2005 7:08:19 PM PDT by hombre_sincero (www.spadata.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Every front page, and every five minutes on every news broadcast for months.


43 posted on 09/27/2005 7:09:27 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

44 posted on 09/27/2005 7:10:39 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

45 posted on 09/27/2005 7:11:21 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: Criminal Number 18F
I can still spell Lt. Calley. Different war but that young man walked the Army plank so that the people in charge could feel good about themselves.

Disgusting.

47 posted on 09/27/2005 7:13:04 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

She should have received a medal. Take the visegrips to these filthy POS-it's fine with me. Seems like most have forgotten who we're fighting. Although wearing panties on your head IS almost as humiliating as having your head removed with a rusty kitchen knife...


48 posted on 09/27/2005 7:13:17 PM PDT by eddiemunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

3 years seems like the appropriate sentence to me.


49 posted on 09/27/2005 7:14:09 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hombre_sincero
that sentence sounds fair for the actual crime she was guilty of - mainly stupidity.

But stupidity isn't supposed to be a court-martial offense.

50 posted on 09/27/2005 7:16:11 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hombre_sincero
I was always of the feeling that the punishment for the leaders should be equal to the TOTAL punishment for all those under their command. If 10 enlisted get 1 year each, the CO deserves no less than 10 years!

The only problem is that the Officier that has been in 10 years gets punished for the actions of A-Holes who have been in less than 4. By your plan, we would be out of officers in 6 months!

51 posted on 09/27/2005 7:16:42 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

Oh man, throw him in jail


52 posted on 09/27/2005 7:19:44 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways
3 years seems like the appropriate sentence to me.

Maybe her child will mature faster than her, without her.

53 posted on 09/27/2005 7:20:49 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
The military found an ignorant girl who was not leadership quality material, who did what she was told, who never heard of the Geneva Convention, much less read it,...who only knew to do what she was told by an officer of higher rank....in other words,...a dumbass. Now she is convicted and will do 3 years and after three years will not know why she was locked up really. And whoever was in the leadership of this bunch of renegades are gonna get, at best, a slap on the wrist.

She ought to be discharged and allowed to get on with her life. The panty head terrorists had been trying to kill her and the Americans there. We don't want to put panties on their head, so take a sensitivity training course. They cut the Americans heads off, videoed the event, and then threw the corpse on the side of the highway. Somehow this equation seems lopsided. Justice was not served. Political correctness was served.

54 posted on 09/27/2005 7:21:59 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

I don't condone what she did, but she received a sentence that was far to stiff. She was manipulated by Graner.

Keep in mind that she was abusing killers. The liberal bias media made these victims out to be innocent humble Muslims.

~Scott~


55 posted on 09/27/2005 7:23:35 PM PDT by jscottdavis_for_48th_district (J. Scott Davis http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jscottdavisfanclub ... Hollywood's Next Action Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Image hosted by Photobucket.com Sterilize Her...
56 posted on 09/27/2005 7:26:09 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup


that is, of course, the officer is guilty of gross negligence and malfeasance like these were.


57 posted on 09/27/2005 7:27:29 PM PDT by hombre_sincero (www.spadata.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jscottdavis_for_48th_district

Many of us civilians also forget that the prison was incredibly overpopulated by this human debris who were constantly on the verge of rioting. Outside of the prison attacks were taking place on an almost daily basis. Yeah, sounds like a great time...


58 posted on 09/27/2005 7:27:51 PM PDT by eddiemunster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hombre_sincero
that is, of course, the officer is guilty of gross negligence and malfeasance like these were.

They may have been negligent, but they did not order the actions. If my child steals the car, should I be barred from driving for life? (probably a bad analogy).

59 posted on 09/27/2005 7:34:21 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
"Who can think of a person who has disgraced the United States Army more?"

X42 comes to mind

60 posted on 09/27/2005 7:35:08 PM PDT by ChefKeith ( If Diplomacy worked, then we would be sitting here talking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson