Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Afghanistan urged to fast-track legalisation of opium crop
Yahoo News / AFP ^ | Mon Sep 26, 2005 | AFP

Posted on 09/26/2005 8:13:24 AM PDT by Freebird Forever

Afghanistan urgently needs to legalise its massive opium crop, which supplies most of the world's heroin, to avoid becoming a narco-state and to fund reconstruction, a think-tank said here.

The recommendations were part of a study released by The Senlis Council at a conference in the Kabul to push for the destitute nation to legalise opium production and channel the crop into the manufacture of legal painkillers.

Afghanistan produces about 87 percent of the world's supply of opium.

The council, a Paris-based body of politicians, experts and academics, said the current policy of trying to eradicate the fields of poppies that yield opium, which makes up about half of Afghanistan's income, was a costly failure.

The policy had little impact while demonising Afghan farmers and destroying "a valuable natural resource rather than turning it into a powerful driver for economic development," the study said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; opium; wod; wodlist

1 posted on 09/26/2005 8:13:25 AM PDT by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
That's one way of dealing with the problem.

Limbaugh must be thrilled beyond belief.

2 posted on 09/26/2005 8:15:15 AM PDT by Freebird Forever (If they're truly public servants, why do they live in mansions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever

My back's killing me.


3 posted on 09/26/2005 8:16:41 AM PDT by battlegearboat (It's always cooler on the other side of the pillow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever

They should institute the same farm subsidy program we have, with the land bank. Pay them to NOT grow poppies.........works here..........


4 posted on 09/26/2005 8:18:33 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
Morphine Capital of the World.
5 posted on 09/26/2005 8:19:32 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Ponce de Leon is coming here to look for the fountain of dumb. The DNC is his first stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
Afghanistan urgently needs to legalise its massive opium crop, which supplies most of the world's heroin, to avoid becoming a narco-state

If its primary source of revenue is opium, and its regional leaders derive their power from opium, it is already a narco-state. Legalizing it only makes it de jure instead of de facto.

6 posted on 09/26/2005 8:20:36 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Pay them to NOT grow poppies.........works here..........

They'd probably take the money and still grow the poppies. Or someone else in their tribe would do it for them.

7 posted on 09/26/2005 8:21:35 AM PDT by Freebird Forever (If they're truly public servants, why do they live in mansions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever; freepatriot32

Very smart. They are entirely correct. American drug policy is effecting our national security. This is unconsciounable.


8 posted on 09/26/2005 8:23:40 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever

My late grandfather was paid (60's) to Not grow corn, Not grow cotten, and Not grow soybeans. He didn't tell them he was retired..............


9 posted on 09/26/2005 8:24:18 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marron

It largely removes the need for para-military support by taking the trade above the table, which makes the little petty tyrants superfluous -- and broke.

The money they made "protecting" the growers is the source of paying the troops that end up supporting the taliban, et al.


10 posted on 09/26/2005 8:31:40 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (A good friend helps you move. A great friend helps you move a body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
It largely removes the need for para-military support by taking the trade above the table

It would be a lot cheaper to simply buy the entire crop at wholesale prices (e.g. $2 billion), then distribute it for legitimate worldwide medical use.

It's the middlemen, the Pakistani ISI, al Qaeda, the Chechnyans and other outlaws who benefit from the *illicit* opium and heroin markets.

Last I read, the "don't grow opium" pricing was too low to incentivize the farmers.

11 posted on 09/26/2005 8:55:21 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever

With Viox and other NSAIDs off the market, there is a need for more effective pain relief. Third world countries need cheaper forms of pain relief. Opiates are presently over-demonized. With regulated dosage, people can function productively. The odd and miraculous thing about opiates is that when pain is present, they relieve the pain better than any known medication and do not make the person "high".


12 posted on 09/26/2005 10:21:06 AM PDT by bukkdems ("My aunt was very frugal" - Benon Savon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
They should institute the same farm subsidy program we have, with the land bank. Pay them to NOT grow poppies.........works here..

I will assume there was some sarcasm in that comment..

It is a Federal Offense to grow opium poppies in the US..
It has only been a couple of years ago that some little old lady got into major trouble for growing a few plants, having no idea what they were..

We ( the US ) do not pay anyone here not to grow poppies..
We ( the US ) throw them in jail..

13 posted on 09/26/2005 10:46:17 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Well, If they would pay me to not grow stuff I will gladly not grow anything they don't want grown!

We subsidize corn, we get more corn!

We subsidize wheat, we get more wheat!

We subsidize poor people, we get more poor people!...........

Let's subsidize Republicans!..........oops! we are..........

14 posted on 09/26/2005 10:51:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Having grown up in North Dakota, I am more than familiar with the "conservation" programs that you were referring to..

I recall them as "soil bank" subsidies...
And some farmers made good money from "not" growing crops on that land..
It was also very good for pheasant hunting in the fall..
Pheasant hunting subsidies, I could maybe support..
Or Duck hunting..

15 posted on 09/26/2005 11:04:10 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

Yeah, we called them "land bank" in the South......


16 posted on 09/26/2005 11:09:14 AM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson