Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Charged With Animal Cruelty After Tossing Kitten To Pit Bull
AP ^ | 9/24/05

Posted on 09/24/2005 11:15:49 PM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon

Man Charged With Animal Cruelty After Tossing Kitten To Pit Bull

Nicholasville, KY (AP) -- A man was charged with first-degree cruelty to animals after allowing his pit bull to maul a kitten to death, police said.

Roger Alan Fairchild, 24, of Nicholasville is accused of taking the kitten named Midnight on Sept. 1 and pitching it to his pit bull named Damien, police said. Fairchild was charged shortly after he threatened to order the dog to attack two officers, police said.

The kitten belonged to Shanelle Crowe, 12, who lives in an apartment complex behind Fairchild's home.

Shanelle did not witness the incident, but apparently other youngsters did, police said.

The kitten often wandered up and down a sidewalk in front of the apartment complex. On the night of Sept. 1, several youngsters were petting the kitten when Fairchild walked up and grabbed it, said Nicholasville police Lt. John Branscum.

"A 12-year-old who had the cat in her lap asked 'What are you doing?' and he said, 'I'm feeding my dog,"' Branscum said. Fairchild then took the kitten inside his home. One girl followed in an attempt to retrieve the kitten and saw Fairchild throw it to the dog.

Fairchild initially was charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, terroristic threatening and menacing, all misdemeanors, and lodged in the Jessamine County jail.

He wasn't charged with the felony animal-cruelty charge until this week, Branscum said, because it took several days to get a warrant signed.

Shanelle Crowe's father, Tom Crowe, said his daughter and 17-year-old stepdaughter "were pretty bad for a while" but have since acquired a kitten named Blackie.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: animalcruelty; culturalentropy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: PositiveCogins

In case you missed it, it wasn't his "private property" to begin with.


21 posted on 09/24/2005 11:44:21 PM PDT by indcons (Koran - The World's First WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: decal
Thats destruction of private property. That is against the law.
22 posted on 09/24/2005 11:47:00 PM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PositiveCogins

Animal cruelty and the laws against it trumps your inane "private property" argument. To think otherwise is daft.


23 posted on 09/24/2005 11:47:49 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: PositiveCogins
Just fore discussion. Whats the difference in a kitten and a dog ,and a mouse and a pet snake? One can be just as cruel in his own mind by having a pet snake just for the joy of watching it eat a mouse. Yet its ok. Where is the line drawn between the two and who has the right to draw that line?

Are you sure you're not a libertarian? It sounds like you're being coy-- the beginnings of a typical libertarian attempt at entrapment.

Well, relax, at least I didn't imply you might be a PETA member.

25 posted on 09/24/2005 11:50:02 PM PDT by zipper (Freedom Isn't Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
I hope he falls in his bathroom...is locked in his apartment...and the dog gets VERY, VERY HUNGRY!!!

I'm saying the bathroom, 'cuz it will be easier for the landlord to clean up....

26 posted on 09/24/2005 11:50:50 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
"charged with first-degree cruelty to animals" What about destruction of private property? How about the intrinsic value of the kitten?
27 posted on 09/24/2005 11:52:17 PM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon

Shoot the dog.

Neuter him.


28 posted on 09/24/2005 11:52:26 PM PDT by msf92497 (Bored as hell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluefish

Some people have mice for pets too.


29 posted on 09/24/2005 11:53:06 PM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon

I sat in a very tight spot in the backseat with crates carrying 3 adult cats and 5 kittens to evacuate the hurricane winds that were predicted(thankfully changed)in our area..

The thought that one could be so cruel to one of these kittens is appalling.The man is dangerous to humans,too, if he is so cruel to a kitten. He also traumatized the children...


30 posted on 09/24/2005 11:53:58 PM PDT by MEG33 (Just N of The Woodlands..N of Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PositiveCogins

"Cruelty is one thing and what you do with your own private property is another." This was your original statement. I pointed out that the kitten wasn't his private property to begin with. Don't worry about making a fool of yourself with your statements; I did it earlier today on an unrelated thread :)


31 posted on 09/24/2005 11:57:08 PM PDT by indcons (Koran - The World's First WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
Yo! Mr. Fairchild!


32 posted on 09/24/2005 11:57:54 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper
Actually if I saw someone feed a kitten to a pitbull for fun I'd knock him into next week.
33 posted on 09/24/2005 11:58:13 PM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PositiveCogins

You have made your point, gotten some attention. Feel better?


34 posted on 09/25/2005 12:00:01 AM PDT by MEG33 (Just N of The Woodlands..N of Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: paulat

See post #31 on this thread especially the last sentence :)


35 posted on 09/25/2005 12:00:32 AM PDT by indcons (Koran - The World's First WMD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: indcons

"making a fool of yourself with your statements" No. It
was just for discussion. How long will it be before "cruelty
to animals" is used for cows, chickens, pigs, etc? Who decides whats cruel and whats not?


36 posted on 09/25/2005 12:07:51 AM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Not yet but getting there.


37 posted on 09/25/2005 12:09:04 AM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: indcons

No fool, dallink!!! You just used absurdity to make a point and then realized how clever you were!


38 posted on 09/25/2005 12:09:41 AM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Coat his gonads with blood and get the dog to maul him.


39 posted on 09/25/2005 12:09:45 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Finally, people understand that Liberalism IS a religion! Faith (twisted) rather than logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

I couldn't and someone who would is one step away from Jeffrey Dahmer.


40 posted on 09/25/2005 12:10:50 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson