Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wrong Battle (Newsweak's Clift's "close to WH Source" info on O'Conner replacement)
Newsweek ^ | 9/23/05 | Eleanor Clift

Posted on 09/24/2005 8:35:24 AM PDT by frankjr

...

Bush would really like to name Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to the Sandra Day O’Connor vacancy, but the events of the last few weeks have conspired against Gonzales. With Bush’s approval rating at 40 percent, he can’t afford to alienate his base of social conservatives. Bush promised them another Scalia or Thomas, unapologetic “originalists” who don’t invite a guessing game about where they stand on Roe. A strategist who has worked with conservative groups says, “If he named Gonzales, it would be the equivalent of his father reneging on taxes. It would be an event of that magnitude. He’d be down in the 30s [in approval polls].”

A source close to the White House says there is a “pretty vigorous internal debate” over whom to nominate, and Gonzales has strong supporters, notably Karl Rove and Bush. Knowing Gonzales would be a lightning rod for a really harsh debate, Rove’s attitude is “so be it.” He’s tired of his boss getting kicked around in the media, and doesn’t shy away from a good fight. But Bush is spoiled by the Roberts nomination and doesn’t relish taking on both the right of his party and the left at a time when he’s at such a low point politically. “Find me another Roberts,” he has instructed aides, who are combing the country for a conservative woman jurist who can pass muster with the right and not overly antagonize Senate Democrats. “It will be a new name,” this source promises—although Priscilla Owen, named to the Fifth Circuit this spring as part of the bipartisan compromise, is still in the running.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eitchclift; gonzales; judicialnominees; oconner; roberts; scotus; souroldwitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Annoying parts of her article left out.
1 posted on 09/24/2005 8:35:25 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Annoying parts of her article left out.

Not quite. You left the most annoying part in:

"Eleanor Clift"

2 posted on 09/24/2005 8:38:21 AM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

I like Miguel Estrada.


3 posted on 09/24/2005 8:38:38 AM PDT by syriacus (Galloway blusters w/ such a "cute" accent. Did Germans think Hitler's Austrian accent was cute?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
With Bush’s approval rating at 40 percent, he can’t afford to alienate his base of social conservatives.

This makes no sense. He isn't up for reelection, Cheney isn't going to run for the top job...what does Bush lose by 'alienating' his 'base' of social conservatives?

4 posted on 09/24/2005 8:40:23 AM PDT by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
With Bush’s approval rating at 40 percent, he can’t afford to alienate his base of social conservatives. Bush promised them another Scalia or Thomas, unapologetic “originalists” who don’t invite a guessing game about where they stand on Roe. A strategist who has worked with conservative groups says, “If he named Gonzales, it would be the equivalent of his father reneging on taxes. It would be an event of that magnitude. He’d be down in the 30s [in approval polls].”

Wow. Maybe reality is setting in.

5 posted on 09/24/2005 8:40:56 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Oh yeah...like Eleanor Clift has real inside sources in the Bush White House, and like that rag, Newsweek, is good for anything more than lining the bird's cage.


6 posted on 09/24/2005 8:41:37 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
How the heck would Eleanor Cliff know anything about what President Bush wants to do?

Does anyone think President Bush and his leak proof White house would leak such garbage to Eleanor Clift? Clift lies in her columns and anyone with a brain can see it.

The press believes that Bush is going to do what he always does with campaign promises.. He tries his best to keep them. Eleanor wants us to believe that bush would not keep his word if his approval ratings were better.

Eleanor Lies .. She intentionally lies. However Eleanor is so stupid that she believes that we don't know it.

7 posted on 09/24/2005 8:41:50 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

Interesting line about Roberts.

"It wouldn’t be the first time a Supreme Court justice stepped down to run for president."


8 posted on 09/24/2005 8:42:29 AM PDT by gondramB ( A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always count on the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carling
This makes no sense. He isn't up for reelection, Cheney isn't going to run for the top job...what does Bush lose by 'alienating' his 'base' of social conservatives?

The senate. I run the GOTV effort in a large mountain state county for the R's. We will have a huge dropoff in volunteers in 2006 if W nominates Gonzalez. It'll be ugly.

9 posted on 09/24/2005 8:42:47 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Gonzales has strong supporters, notably Karl Rove and Bush.

I'm sure Gonzales is a really nice guy, and a great pal of GW and Karl, but as I've said many times to my colleagues; as true-believers, we're not in this to advance nice people and our friends. We're in this to advance the conservative cause. I will fight to the mat any day, for a cranky, disagreeable person who is a diehard conservative over a really nice, fun person or good friends who hold moderate views. There is too much at stake here. There are plenty of ways he can honor his old friend Gonzales without placing his moderate ideology at the cutting edge of the battle for the future of Western Civilization.

10 posted on 09/24/2005 8:43:05 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

Crappy analysis by a political hack.

Bush is not running for anything. Congress's approval rating is ten point less than his. Roberts was a wonderful pick. He parties with senators, they accepted him as one of the group.

I wonder who Bush will pick next...it'll be fun!

DK


11 posted on 09/24/2005 8:43:29 AM PDT by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

> ... like that rag, Newsweek, is good for anything more
> than lining the bird's cage.

Not even that.
Claycoat paper isn't that absorbent.


12 posted on 09/24/2005 8:44:40 AM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
With Bush’s approval rating at 40 percent, he can’t afford to alienate his base of social conservatives. Bush promised them another Scalia or Thomas, unapologetic “originalists” who don’t invite a guessing game about where they stand on Roe. A strategist who has worked with conservative groups says, “If he named Gonzales, it would be the equivalent of his father reneging on taxes.

Well I'll be! The annoy b*tch has got it right!

(broken clock is right twice a day alert.)

13 posted on 09/24/2005 8:44:41 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
A source close to the White House

Maybe Barney, Bush's dog told her this. Newsweak is so bad that the doctor's offices in my area won't stock them because nobody reads it.

14 posted on 09/24/2005 8:44:55 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
“If he named Gonzales, it would be the equivalent of his father reneging on taxes."

True.

15 posted on 09/24/2005 8:45:00 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Eleanor Clift? Newsweek? LOL Wow, they are legendary for their inside track to the Bush White House. (Speaking of REALITY...)


16 posted on 09/24/2005 8:45:00 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

" Not quite. You left the most annoying part in:

"Eleanor Clift""

LOL. I hestiated posting, but since I stopped watching "McLaughlin group" several years ago, she doesn't annoy me quite as much. Out of sight...


17 posted on 09/24/2005 8:45:32 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carling
...what does Bush lose by 'alienating' his 'base' of social conservatives?

Political capital. It's indispensable for pursuing policy goals. Without it, he immediately becomes a lame-duck for the rest of his Presidency.

18 posted on 09/24/2005 8:46:47 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Eleanor Clift is an idiot and I do not believe she "has sources inside the White House."
Nor do I believe, that the President does not know EXACTLY who he is going to nominate and has for a long time.
The idea of filing Supreme Court seats is not a new one to Bush Co.
19 posted on 09/24/2005 8:46:51 AM PDT by msnimje (Hurricane KATRINA - An Example of Nature's Enforcement of Eminent Domain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
“Find me another Roberts,” he has instructed aides, who are combing the country for a conservative woman jurist who can pass muster with the right and not overly antagonize Senate Democrats.

Or does this mean another stealth maybe.

This article accurately represents the utter lack of principles of Bush and the Republican party. If a promise is to be kept and an open originalist named, it will only be done due with tremendous pressure from the base.

20 posted on 09/24/2005 8:46:52 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson