Posted on 09/23/2005 9:47:42 PM PDT by Skibert
BAGHDAD (Army News Service, Sept. 23, 2005) The newest addition to the Armys artillery arsenal was successfully fired this month during Operation Restoring Rights in Tal Afar, Iraq, and Operation Sayaid in Iraqs Al Anbar Province.
The Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System destroyed two insurgent strongholds from a distance of more than 50 kilometers away. Battery B, 3rd Battalion, 13th Field Artillery Regiment fired eight guided rockets in Tal Afar Sept. 9 and 10, killing 48 insurgents, said Maj. Jeremy McGuire, deputy of operations, Force Field Artillery, Multi-National Corps Iraq.
Battery A, 3-13 FAR fired another six rockets Sept. 11, destroying the Mishal Bridge and preventing its use for insurgent forces in the Al Anbar province in Western Iraq, McGuire added.
(Excerpt) Read more at 4.army.mil ...
newa = news :-)
Colonel! Put 10 on the Syrian border!
Caption:
A cloud of smoke and debris rise from the impact of the U.S. Army's latest precision-guided rocket system during a recent test-fire in Baghdad.
Taken On: 06/23/2005
Photographer: Sgt. Michael J. Carden
Caption:
The second of two U.S. Army precision-guided rockets enters the building during a recent test-fire in Baghdad.
Taken On: 06/23/2005
Photographer: Sgt. Michael J. Carden
Caption:
A ball of fire emerges from the cloud of smoke and debris during a test-fire of the U.S. Army's latest unitary-guided rocket system recently in Baghdad. The unitary-guided, multiple-launch rocket system has been tested in the United States, but this was its first test-fire in Iraq.
Taken On: 06/23/2005
Photographer: Sgt. Michael J. Carden
Caption: A cloud of smoke and debris rise from the impact of the U.S. Army's latest unitary-guided rocket system during a recent test-fire in Baghdad.
Taken On: 06/25/2005
Photographer: Sgt. Michael J. Carden
Sounds like were losing to me.
Outstanding news! Thanks for posting.
the standard mlrs, is ballistic. Once it is fired the laws of ballistics take over. The Gmlrs is is guided by gps.
Bookmark
Ummm, what about one in Tyson's Corner, VA with the coordinates for the Democrat side of the Senate? Ah, to dream, per chance, to dream....
Ummm, what about one in Tyson's Corner, VA with the coordinates for the Democrat side of the Senate? Ah, to dream, per chance, to dream....
For our troops to have extremely accurate long-range all-weather artillery (which is what this system amounts to, when using the unitary warhead) is a Very Good Thing.
And it will undoubtedly reduce collateral damage compared with alternatives such as 500 lb air-dropped precision guided bombs especially when its employed against larger reinforced concrete buildings (like the one in those pictures) or targets well separated from other structures.
But to introduce a note of realism here, when you are employing a 180lb HE warhead accurate to 30 feet or so against the sort of structure typical in urban Iraq, you are often going to get significant collateral damage its a bit misleading to describe this sort of result, against such targets, as surgical.
An excellent way to honor the 9-11 anniversary.
GMLRS has more accuracy with guiding capabilities, and more range. The terrorists will never be able to reuse Tal Afar any more becuase these GMLRS will be in a good position to always target Tal Afar. I think I will keep my mouth shut more about this.
It depends on what your meaning of the word is, is. I meant your definition of the phrase surgical strike. Hey, I thought the dropping of Little Man and Fatboy were surgical strikes...... they both hit japan. No one in Los Angles was hit, {but looking back on it, nevermind}.
I like to see my tax dollars spent on stuff like this!
"Sounds like **were** losing to me."
Did you mean we're?
Yes I did. Sorry, you caught me with a typo. Chalked it up to a failed attempt at sarcasm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.