Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arnold: I'd 'kill' anyone who took daughter for abortion
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 22, 2005

Posted on 09/22/2005 5:22:41 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher

Addressing a California ballot initiative, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said he would "kill" anyone who took one of his daughters to have an abortion without notifying him.

"I have a daughter," Schwarzenegger said in an interview with the Sacramento Bee. "I wouldn't want to have someone take my daughter to a hospital for an abortion or something and not tell me. I would kill him if they do that."

The Republican governor, who has two teenage daughters and two preteen sons, was responding Tuesday to Proposition 73, an initiative that would make most abortions for minors illegal without prior notification of the girls' parents or guardians.

Schwarzenegger, a supporter of abortion rights, clarified that he did not literally mean he would kill someone, but he left no doubt as to how strongly he feels about the issue.

"It will be the ultimate of being outraged about it and angry about it," he told the Sacramento paper.

"They call me when my daughter falls off the jungle gym in the school and they say, 'What do you want us to use? Can we put a Band-Aid on it? Do you want to come in? She's crying a little bit.'

"They call us about everything. I don't want them in that particular incident not to call us."

If one of his daughters sought an abortion on her own, he said, "then I would deal with that also."

Specifically, the initiative would make an abortion provider subject to civil penalties for performing an abortion on a minor without notification of a parent at least 48 hours in advance.

A pregnant girl, however, would have the right to petition a juvenile court judge to waive the notification requirement.

Schwarzenegger said he's not sure whether he'll endorse the measure on the special election ballot Nov. 8, explaining he already is pushing four initiatives and may not want to divert attention from those.

Backers of the parental notification measure argue that the measure would protect a fundamental parental right.

"In California, a young girl under the age of 18 can't get a flu shot or an aspirin from the school nurse without a parent being notified," Paul Laubacher, a Sacramento nurse and the official ballot proponent of the Proposition 73 initiative, told the Bee. "But a doctor can perform an abortion without notifying a parent or guardian."

Opponents argue it could further endanger young girls who are victims of sexual abuse or family violence. The requirement to seek a judge, they say, would traumatize already confused and frightened girls.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; arnold; babykiller; california; deadbabies; parentalnotification; parentsrights; prop73
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: BigBobber
OK, I guess I'm getting old, but I swear California already passed a proposition on this subject.

Don't most propositions in California get overruled by the courts? Just my perception.

41 posted on 09/22/2005 5:51:29 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Snapping Turtle

Ping!


42 posted on 09/22/2005 5:52:17 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Ahnold gives new meaning to the word MOnster-in-law. But, hey at least he's going in the RIGHT direction.
43 posted on 09/22/2005 5:54:48 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
His latest announcement is a small step. He still has a LONG way to go.

Of course, any journey always omits the first step, right? :-)

Don't mean to "pile on," friend. We appreciate all our Aussie mates. Just disagree in this instance.

44 posted on 09/22/2005 5:54:52 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

looky looky


45 posted on 09/22/2005 5:55:06 PM PDT by gretta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Good post.

The world needs more fathers like that!


46 posted on 09/22/2005 5:56:35 PM PDT by najida (Once upon a a very long time ago, in a land far, far away.....It was still all Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
>>>>Has Arnie changed his position? Does he now oppose killing babies?

Nope. Arnold is still pro-choice, pro-abortion on demand, pro-death ......

47 posted on 09/22/2005 5:57:34 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I'm sick of hearing about all the poor pregnant girls who are fearful of telling their abusive parents the bad news. This from Planned Parenthood who has been PROVEN to provide abortions to under-age girls KNOWING the father of the child was an adult, but never reporting the crime of abuse, incest, etc. As always, the leftists are hypocrites from hell.


48 posted on 09/22/2005 6:00:59 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (I don't recognize my own country anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Bump


49 posted on 09/22/2005 6:03:37 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I knew I could depend on a "Reagan man" to see what I'm getting at...


50 posted on 09/22/2005 6:04:21 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Who pays for a kids abortion without parental notification?


51 posted on 09/22/2005 6:05:19 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

>>>Opponents argue it could further endanger young girls who are victims of sexual abuse or family violence. The requirement to seek a judge, they say, would traumatize already confused and frightened girls.>>>

So they are saying that a perpetrator of sexual abuse would WANT the teen to birth the evidence that they are being abused? That argument makes absolutely no sense. It would seem that the perpetrator of the abuse would want the evidence flushed down the figurative toilet.

I think this fall under the "Let me fish an argument out of my a&& to seem like I give a damn about these girls so I can push my abortion without restrictions agenda." catagory.


52 posted on 09/22/2005 6:05:23 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Where did he state your interpretation?


53 posted on 09/22/2005 6:05:57 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
Opponents argue it could further endanger young girls who are victims of sexual abuse or family violence. The requirement to seek a judge, they say, would traumatize already confused and frightened girls.

When I was a senior in high school, three girls in just one of my classes (home ec...go figure) had abortions and then came back to school and bragged about it. Not a single one of them was a victim of sexual abuse or family violence, but rather they were all victims of their own stupidity.

54 posted on 09/22/2005 6:07:36 PM PDT by ponygirl (http://morningjava.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Love your tagline.

The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!

55 posted on 09/22/2005 6:07:51 PM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

>>>Even if the parent DID think it was okay their daughter got an abortion, wouldn't THEY want to check out the doctor and go with them?>>>

Or know that that day their daughter had an abortion so they could monitor them like they would under ANY surgical procedure!!! I do not understand how abortion docs and pro-choicers do not see a problem here. If a girl has an abortion without her parents knowledge, she is not going to tell them if she starts bleeding heavily or has other problems so they won't find out about the abortion/sexual activity. So my teenage daughter could be dying and I not even know until it is too late to keep an eye on her. (Not that I would allow it to happen anyway) It's just not healthy. When will these morons realize the pro-choicers could care less about ANYONE. Let alone the ones they claim to want to 'protect'.


56 posted on 09/22/2005 6:09:03 PM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Where did he say that?


57 posted on 09/22/2005 6:09:26 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
I understand what you are implying, however I am unable to find the quote you post anywhere in the article.

Has Arnold clearly stated a position supporting abortion on demand?

I lived in cali for 13 yrs until Jun '04 and I honestly do not recall his stated position on this subject.

58 posted on 09/22/2005 6:09:33 PM PDT by Khurkris (Ain't life funny?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Indeed -- one of the great mysteries of the Universe.

The Bizzaro Universe.

59 posted on 09/22/2005 6:09:52 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

The logic goes as follows:
Arnie supports a woman's "right" to kill her child. Given his daughter is presumably a young woman, he recognises her "right" to kill her child.

Now, he says he just wants to know about it first.

I'm not knocking him for supporting parental notification laws, just trying to calm the "Arnie for President" push with a reminder he supports killing babies.


60 posted on 09/22/2005 6:10:43 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson