Posted on 09/21/2005 9:43:10 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
:-)
Honest answer, thanks
You are most welcome. :-)
It is impractical to boycott great products.
Best to demonize them by name and apply social pressure to executives, directors, and high-level management.
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Must...do...my...duty. More articles, must ping them out.
Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
Just so you know what companies do with your money.
...or spread rumors that the firms are run by giant homosexuals who prowl the halls in high heels and fishnets, barking orders at cowering subordinates between swigs from enormous Methuselah bottles of champagne.
why would I do that? If they make good products and have homosexual employees, then those employees are contributing to my quality of life. The company and its customers are best served by providing incentives to make those employees want to stay with the company. The antihomosexual agenda is not conducive to best business practices.
And this is an issues of government why?
Several years ago I met three little girls named Brooklyn, Bronx and Yonkers. All three girls had strawberry hair, with lots of freckles and sweet smiles.
Some thoughtless parents burden their offspring with such awful names.
don't anyone make any jokes about that one.
The culture war is one of them, and a large part of that means opposing unquestioned policies of diversity, tolerance, and multiculturalism - which are nothing but fronts for debasement of suburban America.
Addressing the "gay agenda" is one tiny issue of the greater fight. It mostly presents as a symptom of other problems; I don't see it as a threat in itself.
Hell, they have men sucking c--- and saying that they're PROUD of it... Talk about social engineering and mind control. I don't want my gay friends so exploited by liberal elites, mostly in government - but also throughout academia, entertainment, media, and even corporate culture. Shame (sexual shame) is a good value, in my judgement. It certainly keeps sex interesting, while hedonist libertines grow numb and increasingly perverse in their habits.
It is quite a task, deconstructing the 1990s "wellness" culture. But we are working on it.
And Cingular too.
Soon I will shut off my electricity, from
"Southern California Edison"
because they are on this list, along with important defense contractor
"Raytheon"
etc.
Easy there, big fella. What policies are we talking about here, and what do you mean by "beneficial?" If you mean that a guy can't be refused promotion based on what he does in a bedroom, then it's fine with me. If you mean buggery in the restrooms, then it isn't. I'm thinking it's more likely to be the former than the latter. If I'm wrong, please let me know.
what is the relevance of the sexual orientation? if one of my children were homosexual, i would not love them any less. i would feel sorrow though for the road they would have to travel - with all the cruelty and prejudice in the world.
Correct. More to the point, social liberalism is and has long been a very deliberately used tool to invade, infiltrate, co-opt, and degrade fiscal conservatism.
A.A.C.
I'd like to, but I don't have any confidence in any other car that isn't a Toyota.
I'd like to, but I don't have any confidence in any other car that isn't a Toyota.
Boycott them all!
Companies contributing to social decay and selfish depravity all in the name of political correctness...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.