Posted on 09/21/2005 9:43:10 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
Below is the list of companies scoring a perfect 100 percent on the Human Rights Campaign's 2005 Corporate Equality Index, with policies beneficial toward homosexuals:
Aetna
Agilent Technologies
Alston & Bird
American Airlines
American Express
Apple Computer
AT&T
Avaya
Bausch & Lomb
Best Buy
Borders Group
BP America
California State Automobile Association
Capital One Financial
Cargill
Charles Schwab
Chevron
ChoicePoint
Chubb
Cisco Systems
Citigroup
CMP Media
Corning
Credit Suisse First Boston
Cummins
Daimler Chrysler
Dell
Deutsche Bank
Dominion Resources
Dow Chemical
Eastman Kodak
Ernst & Young
Estee Lauder Companies
Faegre & Benson
Ford Motor Co.
Freescale Semiconductor
Gap Inc.
General Mills
GlaxoSmithKline
Global Hyatt
Goldman Sachs Group
Hewlett-Packard
Intel
IBM
Intuit
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
Jenner & Block
Johnson & Johnson
Kaiser Permanente
Keyspan
Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group
KPMG
Kraft Foods
Lehman Brothers Holdings
Levi Strauss & Co.
Lexmark International
Lincoln National
Lucent Technologies
Mellon Financial
Merrill Lynch
MetLife
Microsoft
Miller Brewing
Mitchell Gold and Bob Williams
Molson Coors Brewing
Morrison & Foerster
Motorola
Nationwide
NCR Corp.
New York Times Co.
Nike
Nordstrom
Northern Trust
The Olivia Companies
Owens Corning
Pepsico
Pfizer
PG&E
Prudential Financial
Raytheon
Replacements
SBC Communications
SC Johnson & Son
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Southern California Edison
Sprint
Sun Microsystems
SunTrust Banks
Tech Data Corp.
Toyota
UBS
Unisys
US Airways
Viacom
Walgreens
Washington Mutual
Wells Fargo
Whirlpool
Worldspan Technologies
Wyndham International
Xerox
:-)
Honest answer, thanks
You are most welcome. :-)
It is impractical to boycott great products.
Best to demonize them by name and apply social pressure to executives, directors, and high-level management.
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Must...do...my...duty. More articles, must ping them out.
Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
Just so you know what companies do with your money.
...or spread rumors that the firms are run by giant homosexuals who prowl the halls in high heels and fishnets, barking orders at cowering subordinates between swigs from enormous Methuselah bottles of champagne.
why would I do that? If they make good products and have homosexual employees, then those employees are contributing to my quality of life. The company and its customers are best served by providing incentives to make those employees want to stay with the company. The antihomosexual agenda is not conducive to best business practices.
And this is an issues of government why?
Several years ago I met three little girls named Brooklyn, Bronx and Yonkers. All three girls had strawberry hair, with lots of freckles and sweet smiles.
Some thoughtless parents burden their offspring with such awful names.
don't anyone make any jokes about that one.
The culture war is one of them, and a large part of that means opposing unquestioned policies of diversity, tolerance, and multiculturalism - which are nothing but fronts for debasement of suburban America.
Addressing the "gay agenda" is one tiny issue of the greater fight. It mostly presents as a symptom of other problems; I don't see it as a threat in itself.
Hell, they have men sucking c--- and saying that they're PROUD of it... Talk about social engineering and mind control. I don't want my gay friends so exploited by liberal elites, mostly in government - but also throughout academia, entertainment, media, and even corporate culture. Shame (sexual shame) is a good value, in my judgement. It certainly keeps sex interesting, while hedonist libertines grow numb and increasingly perverse in their habits.
It is quite a task, deconstructing the 1990s "wellness" culture. But we are working on it.
And Cingular too.
Soon I will shut off my electricity, from
"Southern California Edison"
because they are on this list, along with important defense contractor
"Raytheon"
etc.
Easy there, big fella. What policies are we talking about here, and what do you mean by "beneficial?" If you mean that a guy can't be refused promotion based on what he does in a bedroom, then it's fine with me. If you mean buggery in the restrooms, then it isn't. I'm thinking it's more likely to be the former than the latter. If I'm wrong, please let me know.
what is the relevance of the sexual orientation? if one of my children were homosexual, i would not love them any less. i would feel sorrow though for the road they would have to travel - with all the cruelty and prejudice in the world.
Correct. More to the point, social liberalism is and has long been a very deliberately used tool to invade, infiltrate, co-opt, and degrade fiscal conservatism.
A.A.C.
I'd like to, but I don't have any confidence in any other car that isn't a Toyota.
I'd like to, but I don't have any confidence in any other car that isn't a Toyota.
Boycott them all!
Companies contributing to social decay and selfish depravity all in the name of political correctness...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.