Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hurricane RITA Update (pressure hits 898 MB or lower)
NHC ^

Posted on 09/21/2005 5:00:42 PM PDT by jmc1969

DROPSONDE DATA FROM AN AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT AT 623 PM CDT...2323Z...INDICATED THE CENTRAL PRESSURE HAS FALLEN TO BELOW 899 MB...OR 26.55 INCHES. THE DROPSONDE INSTRUMENT MEASURED 32 KT/35 MPH WINDS AT THE SURFACE...WHICH MEANS IT LIKELY DID NOT RECORD THE LOWEST PRESSURE IN THE EYE OF RITA. THE CENTRAL PRESSURE IS PROBABLY AT LEAST AS LOW AS 898 MB...AND PERHAPS EVEN LOWER. FOR OFFICIAL PURPOSES... A PRESSURE OF 898 MB IS ASSUMED...

WHICH NOW MAKES RITA THE THIRD MOST INTENSE HURRICANE IN TERMS OF PRESSURE IN THE ATLANTIC BASIN. SOME ADDITIONAL DEEPENING AND INTENSIFICATION IS POSSIBLE FOR THE NEXT 12 HOURS OR SO.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alreadyposted; hurricanerita; lookitmelookitme; rita; vanitypost; weather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Rippin

Suppose you hit it ten miles off shore.Before there can be a reorganization it will be over land. Isn't it worth trying?


41 posted on 09/21/2005 8:44:30 PM PDT by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: injin

I'd be up for trying it. I'm just guessing you'd need about 1000 daisy cutters going off simultaneously not 6 or 7. The amount of energy pivoting around that wall is collossal.


42 posted on 09/21/2005 8:47:40 PM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 3IDVET

We can't abandon the war on terror.


43 posted on 09/21/2005 8:50:38 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr

You are right, heat is what fuels these things.


44 posted on 09/21/2005 9:27:46 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
You're right, but with these hurricanes coming like this, cost huge amounts of money,as you know from Katrina, it's only a matter of time before the left starts pounding W. over cutting back in Iraq and the war on terror, even worse than before, to pay for the rebuild he promised...We may have to cut back on one or the other or both, Believe me I don't think we need to cut back on any of it...It's just a matter of how well the economy comes out of RITA and other storms that may be on the way..Hurricane season still has another month to go and the gulf isn't getting any cooler
45 posted on 09/21/2005 9:29:20 PM PDT by 3IDVET (Mess with the best, Die with the rest. Remember TF-RANGER Mogadishu, Somalia Oct 3 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: injin
Even a high yield nuclear weapon wouldn't do much to stop a hurricane. Storms like Rita generate more energy every minute than the largest nuclear device ever detonated (50 Megatons).
46 posted on 09/21/2005 9:34:44 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner

Air in cyclones rises. If the air were coming back to the surface of the water in the eye, where does it go when it reaches sea level? It can't go out because that's where the eyewall is. What maintains the hurricane is the heat energy absorbed from the surrounding sea water that is at a temp of 80 F or greater. This extends out hundreds of miles on all sides of the hurricane. The only way a hurricane is diffused is by it nearing land, which cuts off its source of fuel from that side, or going over water that is less that 80 degrees. It's a self perpetuating system only as long as the conditions are right, This is why The Day After Tomorrow is so totally unbelievable. Storms like that cannot survive over land and the storm does not suck cold air down from aloft.


47 posted on 09/21/2005 9:36:16 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: injin

Actually the eye walls do disintigrate and reform in the hurricanes life. There have been several hurricanes recently that almost completely broke apart and reformed. I believe Ivan was one of them.


48 posted on 09/21/2005 9:39:08 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
well....I sure hope prayin has some effect , because that about all you're left with.
49 posted on 09/21/2005 9:42:35 PM PDT by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 3IDVET

Did we have hurricanes during WW2? Did we stop fighting because of hurricanes?


50 posted on 09/21/2005 9:52:42 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid
Look I'm not saying we should, are, or will abandon TWOT OR Iraq, but down the road if to much damage is done to economy due to Rita, Katrina and whatever else comes next, the left and some from the right could (MAYBE) force W. to decide how he's going to pay for his rebuilding effort, can't spend more on one city than another. And just for the record, I was replying to a post from arthurus and ladyinred.. So back off bub,
51 posted on 09/21/2005 10:59:33 PM PDT by 3IDVET (Mess with the best, Die with the rest. Remember TF-RANGER Mogadishu, Somalia Oct 3 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: metmom

If the eyewall can be disrupted, the entire storm will be effected. Picture this: We deploy a bomb that will release a column of propellants as it falls. At the bottom of that column, detonate the main explosive. Blast will be virtually simultaneous along the length of the column. The calm air in the eye will be ideal for a uniform distribution. Will it happen like that? Who knows. If it does, what will be the effect. Who knows. Should we try it---absolutely. And soon.


52 posted on 09/22/2005 12:49:39 AM PDT by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: injin

This question has been asked, and answered a lot of places on the internet. Bottom line, the amount of energy released by even the largest nuclear weapons is trivial in comparison to that of a hurricane. Probably would have little effect, and might even cause it to strengthen.


53 posted on 09/22/2005 12:52:57 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: injin
If the eyewall can be disrupted, the entire storm will be effected. Picture this: We deploy a bomb that will release a column of propellants as it falls. At the bottom of that column, detonate the main explosive. Blast will be virtually simultaneous along the length of the column. The calm air in the eye will be ideal for a uniform distribution. Will it happen like that? Who knows. If it does, what will be the effect. Who knows. Should we try it---absolutely. And soon.

Strangely I woke up in the middle of the night thinking about disrupting a hurricane with a bomb only to see it being discussed here already.

54 posted on 09/22/2005 1:17:04 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Thanks for the chart! Bump for future reference.


55 posted on 09/22/2005 1:33:46 AM PDT by shibumi (Not a Speck of Cereal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kms61

injin is an idiot.

If there is a way to stop hurricanes and we use it, watch out for climate changes. Hurricanes form for a reason, and to remove the low pressure would equal famine (high pressure no freaking rain).

Not everything is meant to be solved with nukes. Some people are just morons on this forum.


56 posted on 09/22/2005 1:19:39 PM PDT by pganini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It's starting already, here is an example of it already. But if you watch this, they make some good points

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player05.html?092105/sr_wilson_092105&Special_Report&Debate%20Heats%20Up&acc&Politics&-1&new


57 posted on 09/22/2005 1:29:25 PM PDT by 3IDVET (Mess with the best, Die with the rest. Remember TF-RANGER Mogadishu, Somalia Oct 3 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It's starting already, here is an example of it already. But if you watch this, they make some good points

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player05.html?092105/sr_wilson_092105&Special_Report&Debate%20Heats%20Up&acc&Politics&-1&new


58 posted on 09/22/2005 1:32:58 PM PDT by 3IDVET (Mess with the best, Die with the rest. Remember TF-RANGER Mogadishu, Somalia Oct 3 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: injin
If the eyewall can be disrupted, the entire storm will be effected. Picture this: We deploy a bomb that will release a column of propellants as it falls. At the bottom of that column, detonate the main explosive. Blast will be virtually simultaneous along the length of the column. The calm air in the eye will be ideal for a uniform distribution. Will it happen like that? Who knows. If it does, what will be the effect. Who knows. Should we try it---absolutely. And soon.

Okay, the "fuel" of a hurricane is hot air rising. All that does is add more rising hot air to the system. If it affects the hurricane at all, it simply makes it stronger, if even momentarily.

Everyone with "bomb-based" solutions needs to realize: the eyes of these monsters are tens of miles across. That's a lot of square mileage, not to mention the volume of the eye. There is no way to disrupt that system by man-made means. No way.

Even if we could, what about the next one? These are the best way the tropical and equatorial oceans have of shedding heat. If we screw with it, we'll just have to deal with a bigger storm later on.

This is not a man-made solution, except in the sense that we have to think more clearly when we put large cities and vital industries in the paths of these storms.

59 posted on 09/22/2005 1:47:41 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (The best things happen just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

That works out to 12 gigatons a day. Energy output is about 600,000 gigawatts, according to your numbers.


60 posted on 09/22/2005 2:21:31 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson