1 posted on
09/21/2005 10:01:24 AM PDT by
george76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: george76
Ha! We'll see about that.
2 posted on
09/21/2005 10:02:55 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
However, many homeowners hit by Katrina may not have bought this extra coverage.Why should that be Allstate's problem? For that matter, why should that be the taxpayer's problem? Answer, it shouldn't.
3 posted on
09/21/2005 10:03:34 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
To: george76
Allstate won't pay Katrina flood claims As they shouldn't, unless the storm (and not the flooding) damaged the property.
4 posted on
09/21/2005 10:04:24 AM PDT by
IMRight
To: george76
Mississippi's Hood sued Allstate and four other leading insurers in the state on Sept. 16, arguing that their flood exclusions should be voided and that they should pay flood claims.
And exactly why should they have to pay flood claims if it's excluded? I guess bankrupting all the insurance companies would make everything better.
Owl_Eagle(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
5 posted on
09/21/2005 10:05:26 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: george76
ummmmmmmmm did they HAVE FLOOD INSURANCE??? (probably not)
I have no love for insurance companies but they have no reason to pay anything except exisiting policies.
Are they going to try to LAWSUIT them into paying for things they did not cover?
6 posted on
09/21/2005 10:05:28 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: george76
Maybe they should sue to force Allstate to pay the claims of people who didn't have insurance at all, or might have had their insurance with a different carrier.
What a crock. Go after the deep pockets, who cares if it's right or wrong. The trial lawyers are going to have a field day in the Gulf region.
8 posted on
09/21/2005 10:05:56 AM PDT by
Hurricane Andrew
(History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.)
To: george76
Allstates competitors should jump at this and say they will cover ALL claims flood or wind. They would soon have all of Allstates customers.
11 posted on
09/21/2005 10:06:11 AM PDT by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: Bacon Man; Hap
12 posted on
09/21/2005 10:06:43 AM PDT by
Xenalyte
(West Houston . . . sorta near where the Beltway and I-10 have that hideous intersection)
To: george76
The lesson here is you are not responsible for your investments; if you decide to cut corners on insurance the state will sue the insurance company for you. They will not win probably, but if they do, Allstate should pull out of the state (and the other companies will follow)and no one there will have any insurance. I have family in Florida, homeowners insurance is about 4 times what it is here in San Francisco.
To: george76
I guess those folks with Allstate insurance weren't in 'good hands' after all.
16 posted on
09/21/2005 10:07:46 AM PDT by
SuziQ
To: george76; Southack; Brilliant; Buckhead; little jeremiah; BykrBayb; Calpernia; Cindy; backhoe
17 posted on
09/21/2005 10:07:46 AM PDT by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: george76
Don't worry, the American tax payer is going to pay all those claims and then some. I almost wish I lived in NO. For a couple weeks of hardship I could have a new house at no cost to me.
18 posted on
09/21/2005 10:08:08 AM PDT by
John D
To: george76
If the people did not buy the coverage and pay the extra premiums, they don't have a leg to stand on.
To expect an insurance company to pay on non-existent policies is just goofy.
22 posted on
09/21/2005 10:09:09 AM PDT by
Skooz
("Political Correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism" - Michelle Malkin)
To: george76
Hmmmmmmm. Why do insurance companies always own the tallest buildings in town?
29 posted on
09/21/2005 10:10:47 AM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
("I don't care what you do, just DON'T throw me into the Breyer patch!" ~John "Brer" Roberts)
To: george76
Everyone on the Gulf Coast is informed by their insurance company, neighbors, the press... that homeowner's insurance does NOT cover flooding (rising water). You must have flood insurance for that.
31 posted on
09/21/2005 10:11:53 AM PDT by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
To: george76
33 posted on
09/21/2005 10:12:45 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
To: george76
That's the problem, when something like this happens, all the deadbeats who don't carry insurance come out of the woodwork and expect to be indemnified at the expense of the people who DO pay to properly insure their property.
I don't want my insurance costs going up to pay for people who aren't even insured by Allstate. And yes, I'm sorry about your loss.
37 posted on
09/21/2005 10:13:58 AM PDT by
Kenton
("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
To: george76
That's All-State's stand.
To: george76
All State should not submit to the scam idea that the flooding damage was caused by the wind. I would be happy to have the Federal Government to get out of the flood insurance business, and leave it to the free market.
40 posted on
09/21/2005 10:14:30 AM PDT by
Sthitch
To: george76
I'm not so sure this is as cut and dried as most think. NO flooding due to a levee break is a true flood IMHO. But what about buildings that aren't in a flood plain but were hit by the extraordinary storm surge? Isn't the surge a result of the high winds? I'm not picking sides, but I see the argument.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson