There's a much bigger picture here...........and I'm sure that his son is in agreement with his Dad that there is no gain in returning insult for insult.
Bill Clinton is not 'triumphing'....... he's flailing in the dark, and only the media gives a rip about what he says.
This is much ado about nothing, IMO.
Both the Bush men are pure class, and the contrast between them and the debauched one is self-explanatory.
Here's the problem.
What is the difference between being a pious man, and a wimp, in Bush's response to the insults of Judas Clinton?
A pious man has courage to name the act of treachery, and then forgive.
A wimp says "I like him".
By the way, my preferred response, that of a Crusader Warrior, would be to throttle the P.O.S. and then beat up on his traitor wife.
You see some moral equivalency there? I don't. Truth corrects lies and errors, and there certainly is gain in correcting lies and errors.
I'm not from the school of lie-back-and-enjoy-it.
Very well stated! Could care less what Clinton has to say except that his ravings once again remind everyone of his "I did not have sex with ..." or what is the meaning of "is" -- heard both of those a lot today. Let Clinton keep talking and the Bush's hold their fire.
Will take class over the gutter anyday as will most people!
Clinton is tanking Hillary's chances everytime he goes on a rampage. Some folks on here don't have a clue!