Here's the problem.
What is the difference between being a pious man, and a wimp, in Bush's response to the insults of Judas Clinton?
A pious man has courage to name the act of treachery, and then forgive.
A wimp says "I like him".
By the way, my preferred response, that of a Crusader Warrior, would be to throttle the P.O.S. and then beat up on his traitor wife.
And calling him a 'wimp' is beyond preposterous.
The man is a war hero and a gentleman.
Most of you armchair macho men aren't aren't up to GHW Bush's belt buckle when it comes to courage.