|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The heck with constantly electing the lesser of two evils. The lesser of two evils. is STILL evil. Its like trying to choose between Hitler or Stalin.
Elect statesmen, not politicians.
So we can vote for a party that gets 0.002% of the vote and never get a damn thing we want, right?
There are plenty of good conservatives in the GOP. We will be better served getting them to the forefront of the party than trying to vote for a third party that will never get more votes nationwide than the number of people living in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
It's not a coming collapse- it already happened when Congress passed the new Medicare drug entitlement and Bush fell in love with illegal aliens.
Whatever might be left that could be called conservative largely involves largely symbolic issues like the Schiavo controversy. Just a little symbolic red meat to throw to the unsuspecting conservative masses while this country turns into a debt-ridden suburb of Mexico.
I care very little who wins the next election, unless the Republicans nominate someone who will do something about illegal immigration. I already know nobody will be a serious fiscal conservative- those don't exist in Washington with the possible exception of renegades like Coburn.
I agree with you. That is why I dropped out of the RINOcrat party and refuse to give them a dime anymore.
The premis of the article is the conservative collapse. How is the impending Republican collapse the same as the impending conservative collapse?
Bottom line, liberalism and socialism always fail. In country after country where socialism rules the day, those countries are collapsing from their own weight. In the U.S., those lovely liberal Red States are spiraling downward and forcing their residents to migrate to Red States, a huge demographic shift.
Conservatism collapsing, Bravo Sierra.
We're DOOOOOOOOooooommmmed!!!!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We are all LBJ liberals now! Bye Bye Conservatives.
Give my vote to Hillary, you say? No thanks.
Huh? Sounds like a wierd mix to me. Especially the Mensa (eugenics) and the Christian (pro-life, I hope) mix...
The Constitution Party is trying to do too much at once. What they need to do now is work on getting people elected to local posts, then state posts, and finally the federal posts. As it is, they are just throwing away money in national elections. In short, build up, don't try to be a major party over night. It won't happen. (Note: I voted Constitution Party for several state offices, so I am not unsympathetic).
I hope you are a paid shill, because the Constitution Party is a business - and their business is taking contributions from frustrated cranks in order to pay themselves for managing "campaigns" that elect no one and will never elect anyone.
the only way ANY third part becomes viable is when the democrat party disapears.
Until then the constitution party means nothing.
It is irrelevant electorially.
You should strive for making the debate between the republican party and your little party. As long as the democrat party exists voting constitution only helps the left.
But nothing dissuades the Three Monkeys from screeching and howling their enthusiasm for their Dear Leader's....
That "Dear Leader" schtick is the same worthless ad hominem attack we see from the mouth-breathers at DU.
Conservative's are far from perfect but they're better than the alternative.
But it is odd that they would take such low hits towards each other. More so on the Democrat side putting out hate message.
Once we destroy the Democrat party, we'll get to the infighting, between the three factions, the Libertarians, the Cultural Conservatives, and the republicans.
I posted about this the other day, the votes that I cast might as well have been for democrats because even though they have an R by their name I don't see very many Conservatives around anymore. I'm no longer voting Republican until they clean up their house.
Haha! What a joke. Always some losers who will twist things to their own short sighted view of the world.
Since the author does not give examples to support his fraudulent claim it is hard for me to take the rest of the article seriously. GWB is WYSIWYG as far as politicians go.
